On the second page, it's 9. On the third, 11.
It seems unlikely that many people are downvoting them so quickly, and for most I can't see why they should be dead.
I know that there's websites known to publish only AI slop which are probably blacklisted here, but it seems unlikely that a third of the submissions are about them.
There's some automatic AI filter now?
How does it work, and are people assumed to check all recent dead posts and vouch for them if they don't deserve to be dead?
I imagine that the wide majority of users assume there's a good reason for something to be dead, and ignore it rather than performing that check.
check all recent dead posts and vouch for them if they don't deserve to be dead?
To the extent it is important to someone they will do it. To the extent it is not, they won’t.
How does it work
I suspect using tools, heuristics, and intuitions developed through direct experience within exactly the circumstances of running HN.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33272357 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38412074 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28457450
No real answer there though, unless there's someone like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38413375 flagging like there was no tomorrow for subjective reasons.
The submission queue definitely gets gamified - self promoting articles seem to get a massive surge of upvotes suggesting a kind of bot farm.
Enquiring minds wanna no.
I read /newest almost every day and vouch for submissions that I think have been unfairly killed but that's almost never.