HACKER Q&A
📣 reinhardt

Is there a quiet market for 'no enforced AI' dev jobs?


It seems to me that the dissenting voices from software engineers burned out after having the AI hype shoved down their throats have been growing louder lately. Just this week I read several posts both here (e.g. [1], [2]) and on Reddit (e.g. [3], [4]) with hundreds of comments from devs who have long moved past skepticism and ambivalence into one or more of the five stages of grief.

That's not to say they're the majority by any means: the "I am 100x more productive with AI," "I haven't hand-coded in months and love it," "adapt or become irrelevant" posts by True Believers haven't slowed down and still make up the lion's share, especially on places like LinkedIn, where voicing dissent can have real-world consequences for your job and future employability (I may have learned this the hard way after being laid off for nebulous "misalignment" reasons). But still, the non-believers, from mild skeptics to full-on haters, do seem more vocal than, say, six months or a year ago.

Questions:

1. Have you noticed this shift too, or is it just my social media algorithm surfacing these more?

2. What can we (devs) realistically do before accepting this as the new normal? Early retirement is one option, and some have already taken it ([5]) or plan to in the coming years.

I'm seriously considering early retirement too (at least from tech) but I was recently contacted by a recruiter for a role that, among other things, mentions "zero AI-assisted coding." My eyes lit up, but it also got me thinking: are there more companies like this just keeping a low profile? Could a critical mass of vocal, defiant devs proclaiming "I will not be bullied, shamed, or forced into agentic coding" actually shift the narrative that AI coding is inevitable? Could contrarian companies and founders start advertising "organic, human-written" code as a quality signal and a perk for attracting experienced craftsmen who refuse to bow to AI mandates? Maybe I'm just daydreaming and the answer to all of the above is no but I'm still early in the grieving process, somewhere between denial and anger rather than depression, let alone acceptance.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48668199

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48651675

[3] https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1ueidyv/software_engineers_are_facing_an_identity_crisis/

[4] https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1ufed4k/software_engineers_are_facing_an_existential/

[5] https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1uew891/older_tech_workers_are_tapping_out_taking_early/


  👤 brookst Accepted Answer ✓
Look for tech laggards in general. The local supermarket chain that has a POS from 1987, the car dealership that hasn’t modernized, etc.

There are plenty of small/medium businesses that are not tech-forward, and where even SOTA from 20 years ago will wow them. They tend not to pay especially well, and their businesses are often in decline because they aren’t aggressive about improvement, but they are surviving and punching the clock.


👤 codingdave
> where voicing dissent can have real-world consequences for your job and future employability

Yes. But have you considered that one of those consequences could be that companies who are not pushing AI will see that and give you an interview.

If you have criteria that would make you reject a job, regardless of how unpopular it might be, you should be shouting it form the rooftops. Any company who chooses not to engage with you because of it is saving you time and energy. Any application that gets no response because of it saves you from an interview process that would have failed, or worse - a job you would have hated. Which means that anyone who is engaging with you for interviews already knows your opinion and they are OK with it.

BTW, I'm not sure your opinion is unpopular. The concept of the "vocal minority" seems to be at play these days, as for every dev I know and work with who is positive about AI, 2 others are negative about it.


👤 PaulHoule
There certainly are places that have a “no agentic AI” policy because they don’t want code leaving the premises.

I don’t let LinkedIn bring me down, I mean the performative normality is so cringe that I don’t feel embarrassed at all to have a profile pic there wearing fox ears. On a normal social network you hear a ‘ding’ sound because somebody liked your post, LinkedIn makes a ‘ding’ whenever I post something. It has embraced A.I. slop and slop about A.I. because the average user otherwise wouldn’t post anything at all. That’s how they can tell me I’m one of the most visible users and need to be verified.


👤 anitroves
Yes we have seen this shift but to be more clear devs who never used AI will be in demand soon enough as the market grows people who uses AI to develop will flood the field.

At times like that every company will be looking for developers who can build without AI assistance and people likeyou will be admired by many who used AI but now realize that was a mistake. Thousands of those AI devs will be unknown to the basics of developing they can't even solve a coding problem themselves.

Keep your morale high and you will see this happening soon and we may want to hire you in future well once we grow enough to hire high standard devs.