Let's suppose I have been very stupid. How do I fix it?
What does it look like in the path afterward?
Is there even a path, at all?
I've been told software engineers are full of themselves (even Perplexity confirms there is a reputation of being "pretentious and arrogant"...) So I think this is very related. Don't we have the responsibility of "fixing" our community from this defect? How can we heal ourselves?
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/is-it-true-software-engineers-ahvBDBHeQUmIkSdDCzIz_g#1
Have a laugh... They say that even in HN's inner circle, it gets more and more pretentious than ordinary engineers... the more we reach the epicenter... Which might just be me? I'll take the blame...
Someone that starts out with a humbling experience first, has a different upbringing. The path, is to lower pay dramatically, make it on par with serving McDonalds fries.
Joke aside, yes engineers are condescending a-hole. I think the most effective way to avoid that is to meet people who are really a lot smarter than you are.
For me it was easy, cause my brother is one of them. I think I am smart but he’s a whole other level. Sometimes I come up with an idea and work on it for 6 months, and when I talk to my brother about it, it’s like he’s 3 sentences ahead of me all the time. And it’s not rare that I make sense of what he tells me 6 hours after talking to him. So weird. No wonder he skipped 2 years when he was 6, and then proceeded to get into the best schools in the world with super high grades all the time.
I met a few other people like that in my career. This was truly humbling, and I don’t mean the fake “humbling” term startup people throw around, I mean humbling like you feel really close to the ground. Like “oh ok, I’ll just shut up now”
As Paul Graham wisely points out:
“At every period of history people have believed things that were just ridiculous and believed them so strongly that you risked ostracism or even violence by saying otherwise. If our own time were any different, that would be remarkable. As far as I can tell, it isn't.”
When working on any problem or project, assume that everyone else involved is smarter than you are until definitively proven otherwise. By not making negative assumptions you'll look smarter yourself.
Anything beyond that requires you to formulate a very precise question to get any answer worth reading (what kind of smart/stupid do you mean? What result you want to get, in what context? Etc).
Currently it’s a very generic and broad question => any answer can be bad or good depending on the perspective.
We all need to be as well-grounded as we can, and that takes enough effort itself.
When you try to act smarter than you are, about the only way to have a chance is to act different than you are.
I think it's pretty common when that's going on the chances are about 50:50 that you may look smarter or you may look stupider.
The best way to come out undamaged is sometimes not to play the game at all . . .
“Guys I’m worried I might be dumb, so I have come to this group, who I believe to be at least as dumb if not dumber than I am, to help me alleviate this affliction”
Look back at things you've already written in public and do the same.
Or perhaps I'm just being pretentious here. In any case, very entertaining.
or you're a man focused on society where your individuality is forced to take shape around it
it's high agency vs low agency people, anon. pick your side.
I found that owning your stupidity takes off its edge. When I do or say inadvertently something dumb, and I see that beside me others have realized too how dumb it is, I just something along the lines of "Ufff... now I must look like a damn fool" - which usually gets some agreements and some laughs, and 10 minutes later everyone forgets about it.
Of course this works only if the stupidity hasn't caused any damage (yet). Once there is real damage, well... consider not doing such things.
Do as you're told?
Submit?
Great question!