HACKER Q&A
📣 jorisboris

Why don't they remove the cookies (and hence the banners)


I get it if you're an ads-driven website

But why do agencies, municipalities, (government) railways or other non-ads driven websites need to have cookies, and hence the frustrating banners?

My hypothesis is they want to be "better safe than sorry" but maybe there are real marketing purposes behind it?

some examples: https://www.mckinsey.com https://www.london.gov.uk https://www.ns.nl (Dutch railways) https://www.britishmuseum.org


  👤 CharlieDigital Accepted Answer ✓
Likely metrics and tracking of traffic flow (origin, dest, etc.)

👤 aristofun
You are asking the question from the wrong side.

The right side is - why those bureaucrats are so stupid, short sighted and people hating that we have the frustrating banners even on harmless websites.


👤 leros
I don't use a single cookie in my landing pages or product, but I still have the cookie banner because so many of the marketing tools track through cookies.

👤 hbh187
Removing cookies would reset consent and preferences, violating regulations and frustrating users with repeated banners

👤 solardev
Analytics, marketing, etc.

👤 yen223
User-preference cookies (e.g. light mode vs dark mode) are not "strictly necessary", and therefore probably still require consent under GDPR