We really need federated Git hosting to become popular at this point. A company like GitHub should not be able to just shadowban accounts and never reply to support tickets, especially when it has a monopoly in the market and is basically required in the current job market. Are there any potential candidates for Git hosting right now??? Someone should honestly make one...
Has anyone else on Hacker News experienced this abysmal level of support from GitHub before?
When you say "GitHub's AI", you have to be absolutely crystal clear whether you mean an automated process or an AI-powered system that has gone rogue. The difference in implications is significant and conflating the two isn't likely to help your case.
> We really need federated Git hosting to become popular at this point.
> especially when it has a monopoly in the market and is basically required in the current job market
There are more GitHub alternatives than you can shake a stick at. There are managed Git solutions, self-hosted Git solutions, manually-managed NAS repos, Git/GitHub alternatives and hundreds of methods of file versioning.
I really don't think you can call GitHub a monopoly with a straight face. Maybe you could argue they're an unnecessarily critical part of online infrastructure, but anything hosted on GitHub can be migrated elsewhere with little effort.
Then it started talking to me as usual.
Not sure if your prob, but worth trying.