Can you roast my landing page?

At least it shows something sensible without explicitly enabling JavaScript, though I see stuff is being held back by NoScript.

There was some flickering / redrawing / relayout as if you did not have width and height (and/or maybe decoding=async) attributes on images above the fold at least. Possibly because you are pulling in everything via a script rather than just letting plain old static HTML and CSS do their thing.

7/10 at first glance.

(I suggest adding an "Ask HN:" prefix to your title here.)

In terms of landing page it certainly worked, got me to check out the linked demos until I hit the signup nudge. Some of them don't seem to be available in English which might be a negative depending on your target audience.

Loading those exposes the e-mail of the account used to create the application (in [0], data->userInfo->email) and those "blocks" downloads contain the entirety of the prompts / applications, which is nice I guess but surely those are only required on the serverside?

[0] https://docs.trickle.so/api/nge/public/tao/objects/-/associa...

Hey HN,

We're not promoting anything, just looking for feedback to improve our landing page after a recent big update. We’ve shifted from being a screenshot tool to an AI agent creation platform (long story, happy to share more in the comments if you're curious!).

I’d really appreciate your thoughts on the clarity of the text, the UI/UX, the illustrations, and any other details. Most importantly, can you tell what the tool is for just by looking at the landing page?

If you're interested in exploring the tool itself, I’d love to hear your feedback on that too. All suggestions—positive or critical—are very welcome!

Thanks in advance for your time and help!

It doesn't feature any irritating popups which is refreshing. Does seem like a tiny-wrapper around an LLM... its not clear why I would use it instead of ChatGPT...?