But I wonder if we are doing anyone a favor by presenting it as GiB. Most hosting vendors use the classical metric annotation today:
- DigitalOcean: GiB - Google Cloud: GB - Vultr: GB - Hetzner: GB - AWS: GB - macOS: GB
I see this has been asked before in 2017: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13658889
The risk is you can look expensive to a casual observer if they don’t pay attention.
Consider who the target audience is. Technical users will know (or should at least understand if you provide more details) GiB, but non technical users are much more likely to understand GB.
GB is standard enough and specific enough at that large of a size and most people don't know what the hell a "gibibyte" is anyway.