That said, I've been working out my entry package (mostly stock at this point with a barebones salary until we ship v2 in a few months) and I realized that a sales hire younger than me (who the founder has complained about performance wise to me) has a larger equity stake than I do. I asked for 8% (at a $14M valuation) and they obliged, is this a huge red flag?
Is this just a sales guy thing? I understand sales is what turns thin-air into money but their latest seed round would've been nil without my AI development.
I feel miffed and I'm tempted just to look elsewhere. Also open to strategies how I can use leverage to increase this equity position.
Cheers
Marketing people are really good at marketing themselves, their value, etc.
Technical people are good at building things, generally pretty poor at the above.
Cap tables reflect this and your story is all too common. You asked for 8% and they accepted. The sales hire negotiated for theirs, you didn't.
- 8% or higher for a non-cofounder is very unusual. It’s typically 1-3%. Your CEO is flying in the face of conventional wisdom - but that’s not always a bad thing.
- re: the sales guy making more - I think you just need to make peace with it. People often make more doing less, or doing less technical work. Companies certainly often have initial employees that are as crucial as co-founders but are compensated with 10x less equity.
sales is a necessity which many devs fail to see.