HACKER Q&A
📣 Apocryphon

Alternatives to the Pomodoro technique?


The Pomodoro is the default standard for productivity. It's certainly concise and low-overhead, but can still be scaled into elaborate systems. However, I wonder if anyone ever has problems following it. And if so, what are alternative methods to focused work and productivity?

I've seen only one before- the Flowtime Technique, which is really just Pomodoro with no preset time blocks and with flexible breaks.

https://medium.com/@UrgentPigeon/the-flowtime-technique-7685101bd191


  👤 liampulles Accepted Answer ✓
What this boils down to for me is being able to stay in flow for (at least) a couple of hours a day. I've found that task-management-anxiety dropped once I had good flow.

My flow recipe is as follows:

* A comfortable environment, i.e.: a comfortable, pleasant, quiet place (can use noise cancelling headphones).

* I mark on Slack that I am in deep work for an hour, set an alarm on my phone, and then close all communication tabs (slack, email, etc.)

* I've found Youtube Music's "Focus" section to be pretty good for focus music, but I have a couple go-to albums and playlists I can use also.

* I rigourously plan out my work before I get into it, and I also re-plan a bit as I get going. I don't want my brain to have to keep track of what I need to do and to the greatest degree reasonable I don't want to think about how to do XYZ. I wrote a bit about this: https://liampulles.com/blog/jira-tickets

* I try not to keep snacks in my apartment. Again this is in service of not allowing there to be an avenue for the brain to shift to. I've settled on Almonds.

* Being able to put work out of mind at the end of the day is important. For me, running helps relieve tension - but there are other ways.


👤 bun_terminator
Pomodoro always felt so strange to me. If I could just "start" things on command, I wouldn't need any of these special techniques in the first place. And if I do work, I absolutely don't want to stop, and certainly not because a clock tells me so. It's like the perfect antipattern to destroy any productivity in me. Not hating, just puzzled by it.

👤 mofeien
I reward myself after each finished pomodoro with one sweet. This makes me eager to start a pomodoro at any time, and I am now also stopping work to collect my reward once the alarm rings, and not skipping on break time anymore. This turned pomodoros into a thoroughly enjoyable experience.

To keep this from being a tradeoff between productivity and rotten teeth I bought a selection of sugar-free sweets on the internet.

After the habit was formed, I introduced a gambling element by always having six different kinds of sweets on display, some more desirable than others. A dice roll decides which one I get. This is to approximate a variable-ratio reward schedule which is known to make the habit more resistant to extinction.


👤 Nzen
What counts as an alternative ?

Does Seah's Emergent Task Planning [0] count ? It involves choosing a couple of tasks for the day, blocking them out, but allowing and recording interruptions.

[0] https://davidseah.com/node/the-emergent-task-planner/

Does Allen's Getting Things Done count ? It involves sorting work at milestones (weekly, monthly), and doing each for some reasonable amount of time, chosen by the doer. Anything that takes five minutes or less, should be done immediately.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36139432

Does the Montessori method of teaching [2] count ? It seems to involve the student learner engaging with a single chosen subject for several hours at a time.

[2] https://montessorifortoday.com/what-is-the-montessori-teachi...

Do the dicta 'do something until you are bored', 'perservere until you are exhausted', and 'multitasking is okay' count ?

I am of the impression that productivity strategies are just frameworks for thought. Each, with or without a formal Author's name attached, is just somewhere on the spectrum/surface of counting some work as more or less worthy of focus with heuristics for 'focus can last a some amount of time'.


👤 jawon
I do something similar to Flowtime but without the bookkeeping: Orodomops.

Set a stopwatch going but out of sight. When you run out of steam check it. If it’s been less than 25 minutes keep going. If greater, have a break scaled to the time you worked.

I started doing this because I couldn’t get on board with breaking up the work I enjoyed doing, but I recognized the utility of having breaks when that wasn’t the case.


👤 egypturnash
I just use a slacker version of Pomodoro.

First: in the morning, I decide what things I would like to try do today, and make some checkboxes in my notebook - some of these are boxes representing a half hour of work on a larger project, some of these are boxes representing shopping lists, I know which is which. Unlike the Pomodoro method I am not deciding exactly what I am going to do today, so it's okay if I have several more half-hour boxes than I know I can complete in a day.

Second: I do things. I don't pull out the timer, I just do things, and take breaks between them. The time I spent originally using the timer developed a pretty decent sense for a half hour of work, so I'll often find myself saying "how long have I been working on this project" and checking Time Sink's window at around a half an hour. Maybe I'll get up and take a serious break, maybe I'll blow it off. At some point I'll probably be climbing on my bike to go between my home and the various cafes/parks I work in so I've got a decent amount of "get off my ass and focus on something further than 4' away" built into my life.

I'll check off time blocks in the notebook as I get a chance. I also keep running time track charts in my working files, I'm an artist and it's nice to pull up a finished piece months later and say "this took me 5h spread out over a week" when thinking about future prices, or to look at the time spent on a half-finished piece and think about how much more time I have on the clock before (agreed-upon price)/(hours worked) drops too low, and maybe stop obsessing over an area that's acceptable but not great to go make sure every other part of the piece is going to be acceptable before I run out of time.

Third: repeat every work day for the rest of your life.

This works for me as a freelance artist. Sometimes I get sick and don't do this. Sometimes I get depressed and don't do this. Sometimes if I've stopped doing this for a while I'll take out the physical timer and start doing a more serious Pomodoro Routine to kind of reset myself. But really as a general rule I don't need the whole formal procedure.


👤 contctlink
I use a variant of the Pomodoro technique: instead of having strict breaks when the time is over, I just receive a sound notification at the end of the focus and the end of the breaks.

Then, every 10 minutes, I get a new notification.

It's a small mod but it changes a lot my perception of the technique. It creates a lot less frustration as I can finish the task I am working on without losing track of the time passing.

I coded a web version of this variant here: https://focusplus.io You can try it, it's 100% free (still in the early days tho)


👤 al_borland
I am not a pomodoro fan. I’m not a robot, so starting a task is the hardest part, continuing once I’m in a flow state is effortless. My most enjoyable days at work are ones where I’m left alone to work on something, I start, and just keep going. Some days I forget to eat lunch, and I usually end up naturally coming out of it after about 7 hours, but if it’s a good problem and I’m making progress it can go longer. If I do stop to go to the bathroom or eat, I don’t mentally disconnect from what I was working on, I stay in it and think about what I was trying to solve, so I can jump right back into it.

On these days I start once, and never have to overcome that barrier again. If I was using pomodoro, I’d have to overcome that barrier 16 times, and lose time/energy to having to restart and remember what I was doing. Meetings and messages from people are bad enough for interruptions, I don’t need to manufacture extra ones.

Sadly, due to excessive meetings, these days are rare, but when they happen I get so much done and feel so good afterward. Although sometimes my brain has this weird tingling sensation afterward. I’m not sure what to make of that.


👤 mklepaczewski
It depends on your issues with productivity. No method works for all people. Can you describe why you're not satisfied with your level of productivity? What are your top 3 issues? It will be easier to recommend something.

If you want to test one method that works well and can be tested in literally minutes, try body doubling. It boils down to working in the presence of another person - preferably a stranger or someone with authority. It's a strange effect, but it works surprisingly well for some of the hardest procrastinators. You can try it online here: - https://workmode.net/ - if you want to use this method for work, or you suffer from social anxiety, - https://www.focus101.com/ - the community is pretty small, which might be a good thing if you like to feel cozy, - https://www.focusmate.com/ - the largest body-doubling portal.

Disclaimer: I'm a co-founder of WorkMode.net


👤 wouldbecouldbe
Timeboxing creates a lot of peace for me.

Lately been so busy that's it hard to get focus, I've been breaking up the day into 1 & 2 hour blocks.

Gives me a pass to forget the rest and just focus on that item and the rest has it's own designated time.

Of course doesn't always go right or work, but going back to it makes me understand where I have room & when I can relax.

Also different from todo, since focus is not on finishing tasks.


👤 mortallywounded
I have tried the pomodoro technique for several months. In the end, I quit. I found the technique was only good for "starting" the work. After that, the technique only got in the way.

1. If you're not a single person (ie, you have children and/or spouse) then the idea of an "uninterrupted pomodoro" is nothing but a dream. Things happen. If you don't pause or restart the pomodoro you leave it on and then you give up and move on to the next one, or you work through the break to make for the lost focus.

2. Breaks can often feel like a waste of time when you're in a good flow state. Why stop because your timer says so? I'd often go for several breaks/pomodoros without paying any attention to my timer.

3. Sometimes starting the pomodoro would take a lot of effort (more so than just working). I think it's because you know when you start you're locked in for 25 minutes... if you don't have a clear task and motivation to start you end up delaying.

The list goes on and on... ultimately, I said to hell with it.


👤 a-saleh
While you might not be depressed, or might not have ADHD, looking for tips of people that have low executive function can help. Ok, I am not actually sure about the definition, but by low executive function I mean that state of being, where you have things you want to do,but just can't make yourself for some reason. Feels like trying to press a greyed-out option in the ui.

As I am somebody that currently medicates with stimulants for their ADHD induced inattention, I still have a big bag of tricks to make me do stuff.

And there are many hacks - you limit the scope (Tiny Habbits by BJ Fogg is a masterclass on this, and Unfck your habitat by Rachel Hoffman falls here too)

I used to live by my work-playlist. I.e. Tron Legacy OST could give me more than an hour of uninterupted focus!

Having another person can be helpful as well - doesn't matter if oyu work from home with partner or friend, go back to the office, to the library or stream your workflow - I sometimes make one where I am the only person in the meeting, but just the possibility that somebody joins while I am sharing my screen keeps me productive.

I assume that pair-programming can similarily help.

Having good break rituals as well - "Going to get coffee/soda" is well defined and I can return back.

Having nice actual work environment where I don't need to remember too much and the feedback loop is tight. I am doing much of my prototiping in shell or in notebook environment, where answer to "so what will this actually do" is usually single key-stroke away.

In the end you will need to figure this out. Some people live by library-rules and quiet. Other work better with people and abient conversation. Sometimes you will have a specific project that works in a way that just clicks and you won't need so many productivity hacks.


👤 gituliar
I gave pomodoro a try years ago, but failed. It simply doesn't fit my personality, don't like deadlines and time pressure.

Instead, I put my tasks in a Moleskine notebook, mixed with other notes and ideas of mine. In front of each task I put a square box, to be checked when the task is completed in the future. Usually tasks are 1-2 hours long, they are for evenings, longer tasks are for weekends. It's crucial to keep tasks small, no longer than 1 day of work, so split big tasks into small. This is crucial, as abstract tasks lead to procrastination and make you lose focus. The checkbox gives satisfaction when done and remains in the notebook, so that you can see a lot of completed by reviewing your notes.

I use this technique for 3 years now and it works for me. Not sure if it's known by other name as I came to it myself. Hopefully, this can be useful for others as well.


👤 jabroni_salad
>I wonder if anyone ever has problems following it

Pomo is best for people who have trouble staying on-task. You see the countdown in the corner of your screen and focusing isnt so bad because you have a specific end-time. But, in my experience it only works well if you are the sort who doesn't get a lot of interruptions.

I use a printout system (Emergent Task Planner) plus Clockify to help track the real time spent on each task. It works ok and my time is billable so accurate timekeeping is a must.

https://davidseah.com/node/the-emergent-task-planner/

eta: i also keep an analog clock on my desk. I didn't bookmark it but sometime ago I read a piece on here about how digital clocks aren't good for measuring the passage of time and I think there really is something to it.


👤 throwuwu
Pomodoro never worked for me since I work best when I get into flow and keep going for 1 to 4 hours. What I have found helps is planning as much as possible up front and dedicating time to do so. I braindump everything then when that’s exhausted I rewrite it in a structured way and add detail, breaking it up into sections and gathering resources I need, then I make an exhaustive todo list of tiny steps in chronological order and I mean really tiny steps with concrete outcomes. Then when I start working I just follow the plan and since I’m very familiar with it by this point I don’t have to refer back to it all the time but I do make sure to check it in order to stay on track usually when I reach a point where I’m uncertain of what to do next. I also add to the document when necessary.

👤 binary132
I start my day (when I'm mindful) by writing down a brief list of things I need to get done on an index card. I make sure to incorporate anything I didn't get handled from yesterday's card, plus meetings from my calendar, and daily necessities. Then I open my planner and write these things into available time slots. Then I sit down and do the things from my schedule. I start a new index card for each thing I work on. At the end of the day (ideally) I move these cards into my categories for "tomorrow", "next", "backlog" and whatnot. If I have an idea or thought I need to write down, I put it on an index card and set it aside. I also use them for notetaking during meetings.

The goal is to maintain an index card database but I'm not there yet.


👤 Arubis

👤 sesm
Gave up classic Pomodoro technique many years ago, but recently I've returned to it by listening to 'Pomodoro streamers' on Twitch. Idea is simple: the host starts/stops the timer on stream, works during work session and chats with audience during breaks. You don't have to follow the schedule strictly, but after a couple of rounds you get into the rhythm. As a plus, instead of mechanical timer you have a choice of background music and streamer persona.

As for managing distractions, I use self-messages in Telegram as an inbox for any spontaneous ideas.


👤 ParetoOptimal
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/RWu8eZqbwgB9zaerh/third-time...

I used this to follow it in emacs before:

https://git.sr.ht/~swflint/third-time

However this one I haven't used looks more featureful:

https://github.com/SqrtMinusOne/pomm.el


👤 jazzyjackson
I've started using the "NOW/LATER" feature of Logseq. It automatically starts a timer when I change a to-do item to 'NOW', that kind of keeps me in the headspace that I should remain on task. If I want to stop doing the task I have to alt-tab back over to logseq and admit to myself that I'm not working on it anymore, lest my timetracking include the minutes of me screwing around on HN, which, now that I think of it...

👤 paulgb
I wrote an internal Slack bot that my team uses to coordinate “deep work sessions”. It creates a thread, we say what we plan to do for the next 45-90 minutes (the time is up to the person who invokes the bot), and then we have an understanding that we will all be unreachable for that duration. When it’s over, the bot prompts everyone to say what they did. It’s simple, but I find it to be effective at squashing distractions and getting real work done.

👤 gwbas1c
I was really disturbed one day when the Asana desktop app updated and it put a giant "pomodoro" window on top of my screen. I almost uninstalled Asana because of it.

Anyway, work that requires focus should have natural rhythms: There's things that need to stay in my head, and if I get interrupted it's very hard to find my place. So I work without stop (except to pee) while these things are in my head, and I take a break once I finish enough that I can "forget" what's in my head.

It's something you'll understand if you've ever written complicated programs, or had to do something that requires intense concentration.

For example: I had to tweak a server-side Blazor application to deny access in a certain situation. Last Friday I did it in the UI, but that's not a good solution because there's ways to accidentally bypass the UI. The right way to deny access is in the Middleware, but I didn't have a lot of experience working with ASP Middleware. Thus, I couldn't start working with the Middleware in the last few minutes of the day (too much to learn).

I spent about 90 minutes this morning learning how to hook into ASP's middleware so I could deny access to the application. Once I learned how to do that, I ate lunch. After lunch, I closed all the browser windows that had the documentation for Middleware and wrote the error page. Now that I opened the PR, I'm taking a break on Hacker News.

Trying to fit that into a timer is impossible: If the timer went off while I was trying to figure out how to work with the Middleware, I'd have to re-read a lot of the stuff to get back into the puzzle.


👤 swiftsalary
I just use a simple customized version of the Pomodoro technique. Setting the 25 minute timer itself helps me get going as I don't want a false record of the amount of time I've worked. So when the timer starts, I know I need to work.

I typically do 2 pomodoros in a row, and then a 5-10 minute break. But if I feel like working longer (ie I'm in flow state) I keep going.

The breaks are really helpful for getting up and stretching though. Walking around. Giving the eyes a break from the screen.

I record each pomodoro I've finished in a notebook and on my pomodoro timer (a custom browser extension I made that stores a log of completed pomodoros with start and end dates, length, and notes all automatically). This helps me check how long I worked on each task that day. I can also go back and easily look at past days.

In the end, this is just a more flexible version of the pomodoro method, which I find really helpful for keeping myself on task + taking necessary breaks for my body and mind.


👤 cushpush
Productivity is an overloaded operator.

One of the best methods I have in my personal inventory requires pen and sketchbook ("notebook without ruled lines") and revolves around keeping detailed, artful checklists and sequences that can easily be turned into checklists, present and floating in the front of my mind. Easily accessible via briefcase/bag, always available for you in your idle moment.

I think your question in the original post is more about how to structure your time investiture into your projects. No easy answer -- you must explore what works for you -- in general keep an outcome-oriented approach and focus on being extra productive in the Intensive Innovation Bursts that come with technological work. Productivity is not a jam that is spread evenly over the toast of work, it is more like a giant fruit that suddenly ripens and falls off a tree you spent many months cultivating.


👤 andy_ppp
Pair programming. It’s so much better for loads of reasons but having two brains focused together creates more focus.

👤 oDot
I follow my own "Spontaneous Productivity":

https://blog.nestful.app/spontaneous-productivity/

In short: Almost nothing is scheduled. The "what do to" is decided upon at the moment of doing. Defining granular enough tasks is a valid replacement to Pomodoro.

This means a tool that always tells you "what's next" is needed, which is why I built https://Nestful.app.

Nestful is undergoing heavy refactoring this month, and while data is safe and stable, features and bugs are not. If you like the idea but find the instability troubling, send a support request mentioning this and I'll waive a couple of months of payment.


👤 1123581321
I do something similar to that FlowTime method where I write down what I’m working on and add a tally mark every time I’m interrupted.

Have you encountered what’s called time-block planning or hyperscheduling?

There are many of these ideas floating around; I wouldn’t say any is the standard.


👤 331c8c71
I fill a daily page of rocketbook planner as the day goes by (and in the morning).

I almost never revisit the scans of these pages I fill daily (but i take dedicated separate notes when needed). Using the planner helps me to track time and to be productive as the day unfolds so the purpose is very much the same as the pomodoro.

For me it works much better than pomodoro which is imo too much about micromanaging productivity and too little about the big picture (which matters the most in the end of the day).


👤 teeeeeegz
I did for rudimentary tasks and defaulted to 45mins focus / 15mins break time blocks.

Recently jumped on the Flowmodoro train which has been helpful doing creative work (https://focusedwork.app has been great for this), since I can keep going until I really need a break and my breaks are a fraction of the time I spend focusing.

But yeah Pomodoro is hard to use for anything that I need to focus on for a long period of time.


👤 garrickvanburen
What’s the problem you’re trying to solve w/ Pomodoro?

As I understand, Pomodoro’s purpose is to incrementally train you to stay on task for longer and longer durations.

Is that not working for you or do you have a different goal?

“The only technology that you need is deadlines“ - Paul Ford https://blog.jim-nielsen.com/2023/deadlines-as-technology/


👤 paulcole
> The Pomodoro is the default standard for productivity.

According to who?

> what are alternative methods to focused work and productivity?

Set aside time at the beginning of your day to make a list of the things you want to do, prioritize that list and then do them.

https://www.amazon.com/Work-Clean-life-changing-mise-en-plac...

This book helped me quite a bit.


👤 acchow
Write down a list of tasks you need to do. Just a list. At least 5 or 10 of them should be very short (5 minutes max). If not, break down some of the larger ones into smaller ones.

Now when you need to get stuff done, tell yourself you want to try doing a task and see how quickly you can get it done. It's a race! Glance at your list, and grab whatever grabs you the most. Start a timer. Race to the end.


👤 coolThingsFirst
Pomodoro to me is a sign that something is horribly wrong.

When i have to resort to pomodoro i know Im burnt out or aren’t addressing issues of self care.


👤 lukas099
Work 2hr, break 1hr. Repeat as needed. That's what works for me personally.

I suspect everyone has a different rhythm, or lack thereof.


👤 thisisit
I read somewhere that the optimal flow time is 1.5 hrs and Pomodoro's short duration breaks it. So, I set a timer and block all distracting sites. That's all. If I feel like working. I do it. If not, I just sit and do nothing. So, it doubles as a dopamine free zone as well as productive zone.

👤 nicbou
The vacation responder technique.

I tell everyone that I'm on vacation, set the vacation responder and all, and enjoy a few weeks of quiet productivity.

Or the tea timer technique, which is just 1-hour periods, with longer breaks where I make tea, clean up, stretch, etc. This works better than short Pomodoros for me.


👤 turnsout
I used to do a version of Pomodoro quite often. Now I find I get better results by turning off WiFi.

👤 leros
I do something like the Pomodoro technique but I keep working until I lose focus, then I take a break. I find that Pomodoro often cuts into my flow state.

That being said, Pomodoro is great for trudging through work I don't want to do and can't get into flow state for.


👤 bowsamic
In my experience pomodoros are usually best for things like revision and mundane studying. If you need it for your normal work then it's probably more of a psychological issue either internally arising or based on problems in the environment

👤 eclectic29
Did you try it? Did it work for you? I would first try it before looking for alternatives. This is what is called analysis-paralysis. You're simply wasting your precious time looking for alternatives without even giving it a shot.

👤 highhedgehog
Pomodoro for me doesn't work. I find that interrupting every 25 mins distracts me and then I need to spend energy to go back into what I was doing.

My go to is having 1-1:30 hour sessions where I am really focused and don't get distracted.


👤 beretguy
I just take a break when I get tired. The break is as long as I feel like it.

👤 fuzztester
Have you tried Pomodoro yourself and found issues with it?

👤 ltadeut
None.

Just schedule the work you need to do and have some standards for yourself and keep working on it.

If you feel tired after a while you can train yourself to push through it if you really want to. Anyone who's ever run, lifted weights, done martial arts, etc, will tell you your real limit is well beyond your feelings.

If you're still tired, take a break, get a tea or a coffee and just go back to work.

The secret to get work done is to just sit down and do the work. Get used to being bored.


👤 hnthrowaway0328
Pomodoro IMHO is good for boring stuffs. It doesn't make sense to use it on in depth study, at least for me.

👤 m000
Anecdotally, salary raises work much better than Pomodoro for productivity. At least for the first few months.

👤 haq2049
First post, so I'll try to make it useful.

I base my studies on how the ancient scholars studied. In my opinion, the The Scholastics, also known as Schoolmen, marks the pinnacle of intellectual productivity and focus.

1. Stop speed reading

2. Stop listening to music or background noise

3. Stop taking frequent breaks

4. Spend more time reflecting vs moving on

5. Hit the "Runner's High of the Mind"

Speed reading is a curse of the modern age. If we analyze scholars of the past, we'd find that they were actually reading at talking speed. It wasn't until much more recently that people studied and read quietly to themselves. Walter Ong discusses this at exactly at 1:00:00 in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2Z7ezRpz1c

There is no such thing as "focus music" or "music for studying". It's all a distraction. Research repeatedly show that music is detrimental to study. If you're still unconvinced, then let me put it another way for you: How many "renaissance men" studied with music? The answer is: zero

Reading a lot of books, articles, etc. does not make you smarter. Reflection is where real knowledge is created. The reflection processes forces one to recollect, which is crucial to solidifying whatever it is you learned into your memory so that it can be readily retrieved and used in the formation of new ideas. This is why hyperfocus always triumphs scattered focus, and why it is far better to study single subjects at a time over a span of months or years, rather than mixing up your days with many studies. Ultimately, the reason that reading lots of stuff doesn't make you smart is because nothing actually solidifies, so everything you read is more akin to entertainment than actual studying. Seneca discusses this: https://fs.blog/seneca-on-reading/ So yeah...read fewer books, but study more deeply! Naturally, this means you should be far more cautious as to what you should put your time towards reading.

Taking frequent breaks, as encouraged by Pomodoro, actually hinders your thinking. William James wrote about this in Energies of Men and calls it "Second Wind". It's like a runner's high for the mind. There comes a difficult point in our studies where we give up and take a break. The idea is to push beyond this point to reach a new state of thinking. We rarely are able to do it, but everyone has done it at some point in their life. The issue is sustaining it. You can read a little on it here: https://www.themarginalian.org/2015/06/15/william-james-the-...


👤 ryanwaggoner
Focusmate.com - life changing

👤 launchiterate
find your calling

👤 mharig
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hvk_XylEmLo&pp=ygUgd29ya2luZyB...

But apart from that, I personally need often 1 hour minimum to dive deeply into a problem and spend a considerable amount of time to begin or continue to solve it. I do not think that the pomodoro technique is apropriate for me.


👤 thimp
I don't know why people obsess about ritualising this stuff. Just have a todo list and put dates on stuff and train yourself to pick up tasks off it properly. I'm just using Apple Reminders. Is on my phone and mac. Works with Siri.

It's fine to stop doing things. It's fine to procrastinate sometimes. Sometimes you need a time out on schedule. Forcing yourself to be productive leads to crap. Give yourself a break :)