Genuinely curious if large weight reductions are feasible going forward, of if this is just a wishful talking point.
https://kguttag.com/2024/01/24/ces-pt-2-sony-xr-digilens-vuz...
XReal has some very good displays which "look like Ray Bans" and are pretty affordable
that lean heavily on the "headset with a tail" idea insofar as you might just plug one into a Blu Ray player or Nintendo Switch. If you want spatial computing they have something you can plug in for that which is Android based like the Meta Quest.
Personally I don't like the tail because it can get in the way. You can play fitness games (Supernatural, Beat Saber) on the MQ3 where you move around vigorously in a small space (my VR lab is half of a spare bedroom with a lot of bookshelves when I push the couch all the way to the back) and I think if you had a big enough space you could play full-scale tennis or receive NFL passes. Last night I put this
https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/m2020-zcam-bettys-rock-sol-4...
Mars rock in my living room with WebXR and I crawled down on the floor to look up at it. My son dodged bullets in the game Superhot VR by fancy slithering all over the "VR lab". It would be awkward enough to unstow and stow an AVP on an airplane seat, who needs another cable to get tangled?
anyway, the plastics around the wires that are within is not needed. It should be possible to leave it off, because opening of the devices is not a feature and shorts are then not the thing to be afraid off..
Other things like design of the interior, like fastening the lenses or distance holders, nose bump.. here an extreme reduction is may not be possible, but utilizing grids joins and locks and using porous plastics may also have a reduction.
The other thing is,why reduce at all? The problem is, it's to heavy in the front. so pull it back to achieve equilibrium xD