Did I do something recently with an unpopular technology? Did I piss off someone powerful? Did I get too old? Who knows!
Lots of coding experience; bosses have always been happy with my work. I've written stuff about programming online that has been well-received. Several personal projects under my belt, and plenty of OSS contributions too. Suddenly nobody wants to know.
Has anyone here been in a similar situation? Did you fix it? How?
CV in case some kind soul wants to take a look: https://foon.uk/robin-allen-cv.pdf
I am finding that more and more people are looking for extremely specific and narrow experience. Like, if you haven't used
I get a lot of resumes, and that is definitely not the case anymore. Two to three pages is perfectly fine. I would suggest:
1. Add a list of skills and/or technologies you're particularly good in. You can include stuff you've used but aren't current in, but make sure it's annotated as such
2. Add a high-level summary that hits the aggregated highlights of your career. Especially important for making sure that the resume reader quickly understands your specialties and focus, depth and breadth. Your Blender work is badass and should def show up in that summary
3. If you have education, I'd add a small thing about that at the bottom. For smaller orgs it doesn't matter but bigger ones it will make a difference. Ditto if you have any certifications
Overall though, I heartily agree that it's a vicious hiring market right now so don't take it personally. You look like a fascinating candidate! If we had open slots and our markets lined up more, I'd be shooting you an email. I'm a little weird in this regard, but I am particularly impressed by open source work that people do. It shows passion, motivation, and a willingness to make the world a better place, which are three things I really appreciate.
I can't see any job titles - which is frankly more important than the company and makes it easier to skim sections of experience
Definitely go into more detail than just "Worked on" and "Used" - anything on stuff the company uses in the CV is not confidential and you can put on your CV.
Finally put months on your CV - it's not clear if your most recent role was 12 months or 1.
A lazy recruiter will see that as a watermark as your education and assume the rest is amateur stuff. This makes it look like you have less than one year experience.
For some companies/recruiters they often like to see month and year for each position. It can be a red flag as it looks like hiding of career gaps.
Lack of personal statement is a lesser problem. Recruiters won't necessarily care, but it makes a hiring managers job harder. The job positions should be seen as supporting evidence for the claims in that statement.
That said, despite these problems, the jobs market is at the slowest it's been for years. Particular for more senior roles.
My company has a hiring freeze despite being profitable and growing and we're cutting costs to avoid making people redundant.
I'm UK based and have reviewed hundreds if not thousands of CVs.
Besides the standard callouts of “it’s an anomalously hard job market right now due to a recent layoffs flooding dev supply of interviewees, due to a post-covid hiring frenzy hangover, due to anticipated US tax code changes discouraging hiring, and due to high interest rates in the US currently discouraging risks including hiring” the thing that may be actually in your control is I notice is a lack of quantification of project deliverables and accomplishments on individual projects.
Looking at the first point as one example, it could be summarized “created app”. Especially as your most recent work, I’d want to see you go more into the experiences the app enabled - perhaps the user counts who were using it, what the experience was for them, any metrics you might have that you moved the needle on, or what your changes enabled people at the installation to do. Quantifying the impact of your work with each work item I think would go a long way towards making the CV better.
For the first time in 20 years there are more applicants than jobs again.
The economy is absolute garbage right now.
I'm in the US and the situation is similar here. I've never had an issue finding a job before either, but I've been unemployed since the middle of 2023.
Assuming you aren't under financial hardship, my advice is to spend more time on your hobbies and check back in around July/August. That is when the layoffs are projected to drop and hiring is expected to keep up.
Lately, I get maybe one person reaching out every month. I responded to one last week, even though I'm not looking, just to see what the job market is like. I was ghosted.
I think we're just not in a hiring frenzy right now. People don't want to leave their jobs and risk it on something new. Some companies are laying off. For the companies that are hiring, they are probably seeing many more applicants and a higher conversion rate.
Things will come around.
With an updated LinkedIn you can reach out to past bosses, coworkers, and friends for introductions to other people in industry (whether they're hiring or not) – and follow that chain until you find something you're interested in.
Picking one at random: "Worked on frontend and backend systems for this health tech company." OK... and what impact did your work have? Can you cite a qualitative improvement on the business due to your work? If not, can you at least cite quantitative facts like: "Released 6 updates to the product."
I'm going to make a suggestion that sounds negative, but is intended to help you realize if your bullet points read well or not -- For each one, imagine a hiring manager at an interview asking you, "So what?". Then throw out your original bullet point and instead type in your answer to that question.
1. Where are you? You should at least have your town or city on the CV unless you're in transit -- we're open to candidates that are moving, but local candidates usually get bonus points as things are just easier.
2. The CV is so compact it's hard to pick a career progression - it all looks static, and I'm not seeing any evidence of moving from entry level coder to picking up SW design skills to mentoring - it's all just 'created'. Some position titles might help here, plus some little details on how the role worked, not just the technologies (which I'd incorporate into each bullet point, rather that list at the end).
3. A summary that says in 25 words or less what sort of person you are, and what sort of role you're looking for - you might need a couple of variants for creative vs square jobs.
4. From 2 & 3 above, I'm not getting a sense of your personality and how you'd fit into a team.
I'd go for a 2 page CV with a little more room for extra things.
And I have to concur with those who mention that you don't list titles next to your job assignments. Not sure why, but it looks... strange.
Finally, where are you based? Are you looking for remote stuff, or onsite?... And be sure to include a phone number when you send it to anyone, especially agencies - they LOVE to start conversations on the phone, in fact, I don't know any serious agent whose first step is not to call you and have a 10 min chat, to prove that you are not some kind of weirdo. (Ignore this if you just removed your number for the post.)
The problem as I see it is: are you a games/3D Graphics developer, full stack developer or AI/ML engineer? The lack of clarity in this difficult market may be one of the reasons.
I took some time off my normal job/contracting roles in 2022 to create and launch an app idea I had. Then, I only started looking again last year (UK) and it was tumbleweed. I only got a decent contract this December.
I also had a brief snazzy 1 page CV and a long 3 page buzzword CV, as PDFs only. But when I did a CV workshop with a recruiter he gave me several good advice.
First, recruiters hate PDFs, especially contract ones that need to add their template headers to etc. If yours is too much effort, they will just discard it. So I have both PDF and Word versions available.
Second the top half of the first page is what matters. They will glance to see if you are relevant. So highlight what you can do. But do not give them a wall of text.
Thirdly they only really care what you have done in the last couple of years. I used to detail great roles I had a decade ago. It is in fact for the recruiter nearly irrelevant. So I made the older ones very terse and expanded the recent ones. But not too much.
I still have my 1 pager https://eray.uk/cv/ivar/short/ but recruiters now get a new 2 page CV and mostly as a word doc.
In a famine, they may get 20 or even 50 CVs/resumes per role. They will only glance at a fraction of those. Make yours stand out. But most importantly call them repeatedly to remind them who you are so that yours get added to the relevant pile.
I may be wrong - just a suggestion.
As others have noted, you need to emphasize what you’ve done. I’d eliminate every “worked on” statement with something like “solved X bugs, launched Y product, lead z engineers, improved K metric, owned B area, used d,I,g technologies of interest”
Anecdotally I’ve observed a shift away from LC style hiring to a blend of resume+SYS design/code review. I’d credit the shift with dual efforts to find cost effective engineers and a fear that LC has been overfit by interviewees.
In my experience the 1 page constraint is less important so long as it’s easy to get a good picture of you on the first page.
Refactor it to more clearly lay out your specific skillset, roles, and what you achieved in them (improving business metrics).
FYI, your resume is shallow but still better than a lot I see each year. For someone like me to decide who to interview and spend that 1 hour on, comes down to info presented on resume intended towards the people reading the resume and fit feel to the job description.
Tips:
- Post resume in "doc" format and not "pdf" this is because most recruiters and HR feed resumes to parsing engines that match content of resume to job description for keyword matching.
- Recruiters have a DB of thousands and thousands of resumes, for each job posting, they can only refer top 3. They only get paid if the candidate is hired and bonus if they stay more than a year! So know who your target audience is.
- Interviewers hate doing interviews too! Resume is easiest way to get a feel and reject allocating the interview slot time.
I don't have anything more to say than what has already been said in this thread, I would just recommend modernizing your CV by using Canva [1] , the site has lots of free themes and they are generally well done.
[1] - https://www.canva.com/
I would hire someone to rewrite, edit and reprioritise the whole thing.
It's a shame there isn't an effective way on here to connect viable engineers who are talented and clearly care about the quality of their code to land work. Even the work at a yc startup site feels like it falls to the same shortcomings. If I could get a software engineering license similar to my CPA, I think that would be an effective way to quickly establish ability and reduce the hiring friction.
That’s the problem, you know too much. People in charge of hiring don’t want to be outshined.
Good luck with everything, it's not your skills!
In my case I was a 15 year full time JavaScript developer. After years of frustration watching children run the daycare crying about needing more frameworks, not knowing how to program, and hyper insecurity I could not go back to that kind of work. I largely made myself unemployable. If AI eliminates the need for framework junkies who cannot be bothered to write original code maybe I will give it another shot. In the meantime I am entry level data science and enterprise API management now.
The UK tech job market is dead.
And there is more than one reason. One being brexit and an exodus of talent which was followed by jobs. Second is the increased restrictions of IR35. Third is an influx of visa bound cheap labour. I kept telling people that EU workers with equal rights increase overall pay, while visa bound people will decrease it. I know because I was at the some of the tables where this topic has been discussed and desired.
And finally, the economy. The UK is in a heavy recession and it’s not just anecdotes it’s statistics too. Poverty is at all time high with millions of people unable to pay energy bills or afford food. Sometimes these stats leak in the press. There’s a good reason why some people say it’s worse than in east europe.
None of this has a reflection on _you_. It’s merely a numbers game and identifying growth areas. Data engineering is growing and data engineers lack software development practices. Perhaps explore that area. Software security is another - there will be much more trashware written, particularly using prose generators. It will also go up in demand.
i don't know what they get out of this but i'm getting pretty fucking tired of being interrupted by 10 minute phone calls 5-6 times a day when the recruiters have zero intention of following through on any of it in the first place.
The concept is not that bad, as you can break up the resume into blocks of info, and then just rearrange based on whatever the job posting really wants to emphasize.
Even just rearranging the primary skills (languages, frameworks, ect..) around into a feature block targeted toward the specific recruiter may help. Some people are diligent about reading through resumes and trying to give each a chance. However, when the tragedy of the commons gets bad enough, and people can just LLM-spam responses, the interest in "give each a chance" probably goes down.
Ex: UK.Indeed has 3100 software engineer jobs in the last 2 weeks listed. https://uk.indeed.com/jobs?q=software+engineer&fromage=14&vj...
A GitHub, Inc job has: "React experience on a senior level. 3+ years of hands-on experience in modern web stacks." Your resume has a listing for React, yet its not clear if that was a major component, or just some minor detail. "Worked on backend and frontend systems for this fashion retailer" And the description sounds like a lazy highschooler. To get the job you would have to tell them why you actually have web-stack skill GitHub would care about.
J.P. Morgan job has: "Proficient in coding in React, TypeScript, JavaScript" You have those, they're just mostly buried and not emphasized. The job also has "Familiarity with Investment Banking, FinTech, or Financial Markets" You (appear) to have those. "Worked on industry-leading tools used by cinema chains to manage their estates." However, it is in no way emphasized and if it was just sent out shotgun, would probably be ignored in favor of a resume that emphasized the React, Typescript and FinTech work.
1. As some others have mentioned, I had trouble extracting a career progression from the non-chronological format. I'll actually read a resume that crosses my desk, but, if you make me work too hard, I'll just move on to the next one. You're making me work too hard.
2. The design sense in the document is good, except that the typeface for the main text is fairly thin. Again, it's not that I don't like it, it's just that you're making me work too hard to get what I want out of this document. Go for a heavier weight typeface when you redo it.
That's all I've got for now. Good luck!
1. Job titles. I need to understand where you were in the hierarchy. Its dumb but I do, for the same reason as
2. Salary Expectation. How much do you cost.
This is because the good hiring managers are job sizing. They want to consult their table of skills and responsibilities and justify paying you money. You have plainly declared your skills, but not your responsibilities or your cost.
Its one thing to hire a dev, but do you mentor other developers? Manage a team? "Worked On" doesn't give us a good view of your place in the team. Was there even a team? Are you a SENIOR developer, or just taking junior tasks?
If I have lots of applicants, and your resume wont feed cleanly into my job size matrix, then you arent getting an interview.
I don’t see anything especially wrong with your CV. Maybe add a few sentences at the top about who you are, what you’re looking for etc.
How was Arts Alliance Media? I was going to go there as my first job after uni - but they pulled the offer literally one working day before I was meant to start
I think folks reading this are seeing that you are too technical and lack of business acumen (while maybe not true).
For the work that you have done in each company they may be interested in the results of you creating these not that you created those. Did you ever find out what was the impact of your software development on the actual business?
Make sure to include numbers, people love data and lifts in sales, reach, clicks, awareness, revenue, etc.
You can save so much space by summarizing your language skills elsewhere instead of in each company. It also sounds redundant to say Used X, Y, Z because of course you needed to Use some programming language to achieve that. Group all of those elsewhere for those that you feel you are an expert with.
Best of luck!
Those 2 things would just make me close out the tab and onto the next resume tab.
Looking again, I see the gaps are "filled" in other random spots on that resume, like initially, it looked like before 2015-2016, you worked only in 2008-2010 - thats a big 5 year unemployed gap ! Then, I found the missing parts on the left side, in arbitrary order.
There's too many devs and too few jobs imho, so it's tougher.
Market will rebalance, and we need to cope with this new reality of jobs being harder to find.
Something that hasn't been mentioned yet though is the typo quite close to the start - 'impariments'. That'd be a red flag for me regarding attention to detail.
In this highly competitive market, résumé optimisation matters more than ever. Mine's certainly not perfect.
Like you, I'm struggling to find a new job too; but as a Senior Ruby Developer in Australia. Godspeed in landing something.
2. You didn't mention your educational background. Please list if possible.
EG instead of "Worked on" have something like "Was responsible for module that did XX. Optimised the code to serve an additional YYY customers per day on same spec hardware" i.e. more detail on exactly what you did.
The main difference is I have a short para at the top as an intro. Also you can click each position for more details.
Code for it is on gitlab: https://gitlab.com/gushogg-blake/svelte-cv
Basically get out of web dev if you can. Do real programming and try and tackle harder problems.
Or even step into entrepreneurship. A talented programmer should be able to create a fast growing company within 2 years if they really applied themselves.
Makes me wonder if I’m wasting my time and should be perusing something else.
Btw so many people here have reviewed your CV and no-one has pointed out the typo ("impariment")!
Wouldn't the the sudden cascade of layoff announcements at big tech employers be interpreted as a leading indicator by employers industry-wide? Like especially considering the way the news cycle has basically amplified each successive announcement?
Again, just a question because my input is admittedly of no value.
2 to 3 pages for someone with a few years of experience is perfectly acceptable in software development.
My two cents: o Learn machine learning, artificial intelligence - fast.ai
o Learn Rust, Rust, Rust and some Go
o Scala is good. Keep it. All the stuff you learnt whilst using Scala and Python will be useful in _Rust_.
o SDE is huge. Try something other can webdev and gamedev.
No matter what others may say next frontier will be roughly these: - Artifical Intelligence - Quantum Computing
Get good at these. Now, is the right time.
The other thing that’s killed me is short tenured jobs. Like it’s probably better to have a gap than a job less than a year.
I've been to a few final rounds where the hiring manager was already discussing specifics of what I'd be doing and then simply got ghosted by recruiters. Zero replies, not even the canned response saying they have chosen someone else.
no
I posted a comment here a few days ago linking to this, check out the graph for London: https://hnhiring.com/trends
Not are there now fewer open positions, there are more people applying due to layoffs.
- You missed your work goals objective paragraph! Why are you looking to a job? What is your interest? LinkedIn and Internet in general are full of examples. Why do I need to hire you beyond your specific skills? How are you as a human? as a team player? How do you contribute to organizations beyond your formal work?
- I will not separate between full time work and independent, OSS, volunter. I will follow the typical reverse chronological order for work in a single column.
- Put a summary of your skills somewhere (Python, C++) and learn and experiment with Rust if you want to increase your chances!
If you ask me I would pay a few hours of someone to help you with your CV. It could be an average recruiter that has the hiring filters always present on his/her head.
There’s so many reasons coming to a confluence which are causing the higher bar.
Perhaps your python focus is a current issue in the UK market?
You said it yourself: You got lots of pings, resume or not. The resume is secondary to the state of the market.
Going through same. This is like 2007-2008 or 2000. You need a playbook here.
1. You are a media-related programmer, you better be stacking skills in Generative AI, showing your work, and becoming proficient in generative AI tools across all stacks. It hasn't happened yet, but Generative AI + your skills will be in serious demand (AI technologist / AI generalist developer or Creator). It hasn't happened yet and won't happen until the layoffs are done. Don't get caught off-sides when the hiring market resumes and suddenly everyone is demanding Unity + Generative AI skills.
2. Sometimes there is literally nothing you can do but wait
I have been in same position the last six months or so. Absolutely nothing is moving. I have been through multiple interviews, companies pretend to be wanting to hire (they actually arent). There is ZERO urgency in this hiring market, companies are in full on scale-down mode and pivot. We are still in waves of layoffs. After / during the layoffs and restructuring, companies must THEN reconsider a NEW direction to go on.
A new set of skills will go into vogue and suddenly everyone starts hiring in that direction. Unfortunately, you cannot control the timelines. It could take months or years before companies decide which direction to take next. AI is going to obviously be the #1 skill. Ability to show you can supercharge what you are doing by augmenting via AI and Generative AI will be in the most demand imo. But that is a strategy decision and companies are still winding down and moving out of their prior strategies they used the last decade.
3. This is the end of the old cycle and start of a new cycle
Expect it to take time to ramp the new cycle. Skills that were super valuable before are now less valuable. Companies are more focused on shutting down the old strategy than hiring the new strategy.This is a very uncomfortable in-between period and it could last another 6-18 months. The best you can do is focus on predicting the market and getting "into position."
The market may suck for longer than you think, you have to "wait well" and stack skills and networks. Unfortunately there may not be anything other than to wait, and let the market work itself out.
Gaming has been getting annihilated as a market.In a downturn, the shakiest stuff gets thrashed out first. Crypto, gaming are "nice to haves" from the perspective of the market.The market is going to contract down to only the essentials. Stuff people absolutely need to spend money on. All the "nice to have and fun" stuff is getting defunded.
Follow the money. It will flood into generative AI and AI productivity tools.
You see the url that is in the OP? This one. https://foon.uk/robin-allen-cv.pdf
Copy that url, paste it into a new tab, but remove the f at the end. *BRIGHT LIGHTS AND SEIZURE WARNING*
EDIT - Oh wait, the result is different depending on the browser. On one browser (Firefox), I get a creepy looking 404 error. On another (Tor, which is also Firefox), I got a giant strobe light effect with a bunch of diagonal lines.
In the Tor browser, this message gets spammed a million times in the console tab.
"Blocked https://foon.uk/robin-allen-cv.pd from extracting canvas data because no user input was detected."
The strobing effect corresponds to the number of times this message gets spammed (~50 times a second).
Hapland aside, out of 5 conventional sections - Executive summary, Education, Skills, Work Experience, Miscellania - you have only one. It's not clear what you are looking for, what it is that you know and at what level. Single page is a good format, but it's secondary to the info presented and it's incomplete.
Oh, they also can't take a blame for overhiring during the pandemic, they were simply following the same 'macroeconomic factors' that are the reason for the mass layoffs now.
You'd think that the economy is some kind of terrorist with demands holding the gun to the CEOs' head. They just have to follow these demands and the economy simply happens upon them, absolving them of any moral and ethical responsibility for their lack of foresight and accountability.
Basically they are all mere automata that bows down to and is animated only by the overpowerful economy.
It's the same old in capitalist world, just this time software engineers are the ones affected.
The system is beyond fixing now, as you have always been treated as an expensive but totally expendable cog in their money making machines. We should have organized into unions and elected government that cares about humans (and nature), and not for the GDP and their own bottom lines.
Thank Elon and the FAANGs for starting the wave that flooded the market thousands of qualified good engineers as soon as they realized they need actual sustained revenue rather than the nebulous promise of never ending cancerous growth. When the market is that flooded with good people, of course our wages stagnate and our employability is in question.
It's called 'end-stage capitalism' for a reason, because the diagnosis is simple: there is nothing coming after it.
pedantic: not a fan. why "some", why not all of them? > "Converted some Flash games to a custom..."
eh? you wrote the article there? odd phrasing > "I wrote an article about this project here"
left-right independent chronological ordering is weird and makes it hard to digest. suggest top to bottom single column would be easier to understand. you could make the OSS stuff a separate section or interleave.
Since 2010, you've worked at 3-4 different places for only a couple years each and worked on "frontend and backend systems", oh and did a bunch of OSS/volunteer work stuff. If I had to summarize the CV into one sentence that's what I get. I don't really see what skills you have, but you "used" Python, Django, Postgres, Typescript, Node.js, HTML Canvas, Websockets, etc. Well, every internet user "uses" those.
It just sounds ... weird ... and fishy. What actual skills are you purporting to have? Why so much time not getting paid? Were you unemployable? Or much worse - very successful independently? (sarcasm, but sadly too true)
Personally, I'll always give the benefit of the doubt and talk to a person to see what's up. But this CV/Resume in it's current form isn't helping you.
I'm not going to lie, we may not be typical, but where I'm at, when you are young and bounce around every couple years for a couple jobs, I don't see so much of an issue. But when you are mid-senior career, you don't look right. Way too many short shallow gigs.
* You're not alone. There are a lot of people looking for work right now, and less work to go around, it seems. I recently had 60+ applications for 2 developer roles without using a recruiter or anything but word of mouth through communities I participate in. From a pure numbers standpoint, this means applicants have to work harder to stand out, which sucks for applicants and also because it leads to people gaming the system.
* So much of the hiring process has been enshittified. Tools doing keyword scans have replaced a lot of human judgment, and resumes have started to adapt to keep up. I abhor the practice, but: you may want to have a separate resume for places that may use these products, so that you get past auto-screening.
* Your resume is nicely laid out. However, I fear it will likely get you auto-rejected as lots of screening tools can't parse it for roles. You may want to have a version that avoids the multi-column layout. Again, this will be a guess as to whether companies are using that kind of software or not.
* I highly recommend adding your role or the equivalent role to the subtitle, e.g. "Senior Developer (Contract)" or ".NET Developer (Contract)" . It gives a quick overview of what type of work you've been doing, which is helpful when I'm scanning 60 resumes. I would go so far as to suggest You make the role a part of the heading and keep the employer & date below. E.g. "Senior .NET Developer" up top and "Technically Creative (contract) | Oct 2021 - Dev 2023" below.
* Suggest adding start/end dates including Month & Year (e.g. "Oct 2021 - Dec 2022"). It gives a sense of timing.
* There's another tough choice you face: whether to share unemployment status. It's a double-edged sword for candidates. For me, people who state their situation get respect for the authenticity, and those who try to hide it make me suspicious. But I also respect that people are biased against unemployed people even though they shouldn't be, so I would suggest making that a per-application decision.
* I already get a decent sense of this, but you may want to tweak your bullet points to reflect accomplishments/impact some more. Shows that you understand business value (which I believe you do).
* Technology under each bullet point makes me as a reviewer do extra work. Some kind of summary of technology you're proficient in will be a good addition. Should you have to? Probably not. Would I still read this CV? Of course. Will lots of folks glaze over and move on when they have to do extra work while reviewing hundreds of applicants? Yes.
* I like that you include your GitHub. I definitely look at those and it never counts against an applicant (for me. Again, double-edged sword).
* I think the one-page resume is working against you here. With your experience since '05 I think moving to 2 pages and expanding on some of the suggestions above will work in your favor.
* The title at the top of your resume, "Software Developer", could probably do with a tweak. It's one of the first things I see. "Senior Software Developer", "[Stack of Job You're Targeting] Developer", etc. may go a long way. I recently gave someone an interview because they had "Systems Integration Developer" in their title and I was looking for integration work. It would be an effective technique IMO.
* Find your local & global communities on Twitter, Mastodon, Slack, LinkedIn, Discord, etc. -- many often times have jobs channels where things will pop up. Coming from a community comes across as a sort of implicit reference in terms of places you may participate. And there's usually little downside as you learn things, participate in discussions, and build relationships there that are nice either way.
I wish you the best of luck finding your next opportunity!
Others pointed out that you don't mention impact, just responsibilities, and this is 100% the thing you need to fix. Apologies for the handwaving with somewhere (read this on my phone, replying on my desktop), but somewhere you said you were thinking like a dev and someone else backed you with a "we're not MBAs". I strongly encourage you to drop this dichotomy from your mental model. You should be curious about the impact of your work, whether it's to benefit the business, your coworkers, or some technical process. Your resume reads like that of someone who did what they were told and not a lick more. I've worked with people like that and I cannot give them ownership over projects. You're selling yourself as a liability.
But there's good news, judging from your blog you have had impact, so it just comes down to figuring out how to sell it. (sidebar: everyone is in sales, in this case you are selling yourself, this shouldn't make you uncomfortable, just think of it of making it easier for hiring managers to say "yes, I would like to take to this person / take a chance on them / think they will do well on the team).
Taking an example from your resume: "Wrote a server for participants to connect to and be given challenges to solve collaboratively in real time." How many participants? How much compute did you need to process this? What was the server response time? How would anyone look at this line and know you did a good job? Not just "well, they did the job, but was it good?".
Writing resumes for this approach is a skill. I'm guessing you will be a little unpracticed, but that's fine. I first switched my mindset on this about a decade ago and took 3 - 4 hours to learn the basics of LaTeX (I was tired of formatting in MS Word) and followed the advice laid out here: https://careercup.com/resume. You probably have enough experience where 2 pages might actually be fine. (it doesn't have to be LaTeX, I just gave it a try, found that I liked the end results, and have been slowly adding to my knowledge here or there)
Also, your GitHub profile is a mess. You're not putting a consistent good foot forward in your popular repositories. libtweak is pretty strong (imo, README could serve to have a "here's where I used it" section because I assume you used it for your games) but github-code-reviews is a much smaller scoped project. Pick your most impressive ones and figure out how to show just those. I've also found the advice listed here to be helpful: https://blog.boot.dev/jobs/build-github-profile/.
IMO, the two column layout has to go. Also, I'd separately call out your personal homepage and your GH profile. Expecting busy recruiters to click through GH and see your personal page is not a strategy for success.
tl;dr; you're presenting what appears to be good experience poorly, but the good news is that this is easier to fix than getting the experience in the first place