I am the CEO, and he is the CTO, but it seems like he wasn't fully passionate with this product yet and hasn't contributed almost anything. we have several meetings and he always thinking of other ideas, but his ideas are seems unproved to be commercially viable. He has committed to dedicating half of his time to the project in the next 1-2 months, but I'm uncertain about how this relationship.
Should I continue with this partnership for the VC process? If not, is it advisable for me as a solo founder to apply for a VC and is it OK to apply VC alone? If I continue work with current pre-cofounder, how should we approach equity distribution given the current situation (he proposed 50% each)?
I would appreciate any insights or experiences you can share.
But other than the desire to a have a co-founder in theory or to secure investment, why on earth would you continue with this co-founder? If they aren't contributing anything, why do you want to work with this person?
And 50-50 is absurd. 50-50 is, of course, always a recipe for deadlock. I've dealt with countless 50-50 co-founder situations where there was a breakdown due to deadlock. And those are almost always situations where the co-founders were enthusiastic working together at the start. (I'm a lawyer by the way - so I see worse case scenarios all the time.)
Here your prospective co-founder isn't contributing. You need to move on.
Happy to discuss my experiences with this and how you can extricate yourself as best as possible.