BTW, there is a 'favorite' link on every post, which isn't exactly bookmarking but might solve the same problem?
Extensions like Stylus work, but the page still flashes white on load
I'd also like forgiveness. I get rate limited for some perceived incivility & that's it, years down the road I'm still rate limited. Only the bad things weigh against us. I got told on a previous account there were warnings against me (mainly for defending the web against some really nasty mean people, trying to keep some spark akindle, imo), but 2 out of 3 had been 4+ years ago. And I still felt wronged by the warnings in the first place, that I was fighting monstrous cruel negativity, trying to allow some good in. It feels absurd that the bad is allowed to keep adding up forever but the good counts for nothing; we need some forces beyond just the fall to move us.
This is not an uncommon problem: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37208812
- some good way of exploring the comments on a popular post. When a post has hundreds or thousands of comments, there's often interesting and worthwhile comments and discussions. But there are also a lot of the same takes repeated numerous times and long running less interesting tangential discussions.
Otherwise I don't have any desire to change the feature set.
If it can handle bigger loads, that'd be great. Otherwise, it's working, and I believe it's near-complete from a user perspective.
Features should be built for the moderation side, IMO, not the user side.
Everything else is perfect as it is.
Actually, this is a terrible idea don't do it.
Edit: I think there are bookmarks if you just click a comment timestamp and then click Favorite.
There should be an always on, all user "chat" beside every page. This will allow the finer co-ordination of reactions to WrongThink and deviancy. When "VR" comes around again, the chat can be made into a 3d avatar environment.
There needs to be cryptocurrency integration. Make "karma" a coin. People will fear down votes more when the cost is real. Could help fund the site too: sell the opportunity to repeatedly down vote thing you don't like.
The lack of "AI" is shocking: there should be a pre-trained model for every user already. Engagement will go up if we remove the friction of the intimidating blank "reply" box; by having it already filled in with the model's suggestions for your comment on a article.
Maybe a strict "real names" policy, too. anonymity encourages independence, playful hypothetical arguments, and Nikki Halley doesn't like it. If we wanna keep the blind nature we could replace usernames with social security numbers. Opaque enough to ignore if you want, but still encouraging Responsible Commenting.
After all of these changes, HN should be ready to become the only possible destination for discussion on the net; dominating all other media. At that point, it will be possible to fire dang, and begin the "monetization" phase of the plan.
(edit: screaming sarcasm throughout)
I'm new to programming and would love to ask questions about design/technical decisions. It doesn't need to go the StackOverflow way. But could me more high level.