I noticed that practically no submissions from InfoQ.com on HN get any engagement at all. Almost no comments, no upvotes. And by looking at the search results there must be thousands of submissions.
I read their stuff occasionally and find interesting things there from time to time. So Im wondering:
Is InfoQ considered low-quality / low-standard? Why?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38503439 "Performance: Adventures in Thread-per-Core Async with Redpanda and Seastar" (84 points | 7 days ago | 21 comments)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38429817 "Amazon EC2 Enhances Defense in Depth with Default IMDSv2" (39 points | 12 days ago | 56 comments)
Which article do you like? Have you tried posting it?
Given thousands of submissions, it might be seen as a low signal to noise ratio.
A few years ago, I think there was more signal in what I saw on Hacker News...I remember that's where Rich Hickey talks showed up and made it to HN.
Seems like a pretty generic website about enterprise development. That's fine, but is unlikely to light a fire in the hearts of HN users.