I did not know much about the structure of OpenAI eiter.
I have followed what they have made available to the public and that has been quite interesting.
I have certainly noticed Altman being a most popular figure in the media (or often invited to speak at least) and an all-around genius.
When it comes to cutting edge research and development of AI I think that involves a hell of a lot of math that I probably could not understand.
I have a lot of PhD and post doc level research.
Being naive I figured the entire C* stack at OpenAI held PhDs in related fields.
I was thus surprised to read that Altman and another co-founder both dropped out of prestigious university early on in their degrees.
I discovered that the CTO had a bachelors but seemed to have started her career in quite a different field.
Now a -LOT- of founders are the same way. Thinking about it know if to onder if not the majority of founders are.
I can follow what Bill Gates and Woziak did. Though clearly I lack their genius.
I am not able to follow AI research papers at all.
Altman must have hired a lot of outstanding people to execute his vision. and is that the most important quality he brings to OpenAI? A vision and a drive and ability to execute?
Or is he a self-thought genius who can get into the trenches at a theoretic level?
Or am I overcomplicating the skills and education needed to produce GPT (among other things)
Filed under "Naughtiness" at http://paulgraham.com/founders.html
And for being at the center of media you even better not be good or great at doing something.
Take every second social media celebrity, wikipedia even had to invent a new “job” for them - “media personality”.
This doesn’t mean Sam is not great at something or lack unique skills. Hardly so.
But it means there is no direct cause-effect relationship between someone’s skills and outcomes far bigger than a specific skillset or character traits.
It makes zero sense try to find it. Unless you writing another garbage self help book.