[Given an extremely skilled/determined autodidact.] [For obtaining knowledge instead of license.]
Antiexamples: programming, maths (eg Ramanujan), law, philosophy.
You cannot self-learn medicine. I mean: you could but then you couldn't legally help anybody.
As you state autodidactism, you might view knowledge as absolute and measurable. I'd posit it might not always be, and you'd miss some social aspect be that feedback to socially constructing knowledge - as well as obviously only construct knowledge within yourself and not within and among others which would be a social form of knowledge - you might not need a school for this, but by definition a form of social environment.
[Feedback as both (and also separately) an accelerant to individual learning, and choosing paths of interest, is a different thing, and perhaps also worth exploring.]
Self defense
First aid
Shop
Senior projects (group work) where workload is- intentionally or unintentionally- asymmetrical.
Think woodworking, martial arts? Many more I'm sure.
I don't think this will be a very big list, though. You should be able to learn almost anything these days. I don't feel inhibited by anything except the sheer depth of some topics, and lack of my own time. I pretty much feel like I can learn anything.
Almost any topic can benefit from a good instructor, though, especially if it's one-on-one. They can steer you better than you can steer yourself as a newbie.
Is there a purpose behind this question beyond curiosity?