EDIT: I wouldn't trust the opinions of the 'just execute better' posters here, considering your competitors' employees already infiltrated your slack channel.
> When people copy you, the best strategy is usually to ignore them. People who copy you are (a) unoriginal and (b) opportunists, and those are both strong predictors of failure. If you wait them out, they'll eventually drop away.
/s?
There are a lot of people in the tech world with the right connections, access to capital, and execution skill, but who either aren't creative enough to come up with an innovative product, or prefer to be the nth-mover in an already-validated market to the risk of trying to establish a new market. If they see that you have a good idea but aren't executing/growing/raising money at an A+ level, they will swoop in and copy your idea and then pretend that they were the first to come up with it.
There's nothing necessarily wrong with this apart from (imo) being kind of lame on a personal level. The consumer ultimately benefits from the competition, and you have only yourself to blame really for creating an opening by not executing quickly and effectively enough. It's capitalism. All the solutions to this 'problem' I've ever heard proposed--software patents and the like--create far worse problems for people who want to innovate.
If you're working on a new idea and are seeing real traction, you just need to expect this and factor it into your strategy. This is why so much emphasis is placed on having a 'moat' of some kind that is difficult to reproduce. If you're seeing success and it's easy to copy you, someone's probably already working on a clone.
https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1697761812698034630?s=46
https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1500779743804903427?s=46
Of course he’s completely wrong, but YC won’t really do anything about it (except maybe reap the benefits)
For what it’s worth, I’m sorry this happened to you, it sucks
At the same time, seems like you might be onto something and should just keep going strong
Also, maybe you could apply to YC, they usually don’t care about funding competing companies
Focus on your differentiator/USP and providing the best service to your customers. Any decent and obvious market has copycats and competitors.
Also sorry I am not good reading the signals - why would being a female founder make you angrier than a non female founder? Id be angry as F too if a clone of my hard work appeared out of no where!
https://www.bhfs.com/insights/alerts-articles/2021/supreme-c...
This was uncalled for though:
>As a female founder...
Don't play that victim card. It's not respectable, and the only cohorts receptive to that card are not respectable cohorts, and not ones anyone wants to conduct business with.
Now is the time to do this. If they just pivoted, and are literally copying you, they can just pivot to something else. You could even get them to agree to transfer/refer their customers as a settlement.
All this assumes they did something illegal. Copyright is the best thing to check: have they literally copied anything (APIs may be legal to copy, see Oracle vs Google).
Ironically the founder worked at Rocket-internet which was notorious for copying successful startups
https://techcrunch.com/2018/09/27/wimdu-rocket-internets-air...
Is your business defensible?
(Remember, APIs generally aren't protected by intellectual property. It's the implementation or patents that protect your product. For example, if copying your API violates your patent, then you have a case.)
It should go without saying that these shouldn't be new concepts to anyone running a startup.