HACKER Q&A
📣 behnamoh

Is paid search-engine model like Kagi viable?


Search engines are the first interaction of a user with the internet. Yet, something like Kagi requires me to login on multiple devices before I can use it. This creates an unnecessary extra layer which drives me away from Kagi—why should I go through setting up all this settings to make a simple search query when I can simply use google without an account?


  👤 subeadia Accepted Answer ✓
You shouldn't. If Kagi doesn't offer enough value for you to be worth that extra friction, don't use it. That's the free market at work.

👤 bigyikes
Do you use new devices often enough that the login friction makes it not worthwhile? I could only see this being a problem if you're doing a lot of searching from someone else's device. But if you're using someone else's device, who cares if you make a few Google searches anyway?

I pay for Kagi. I log in once and forget about it. Adding a new device is easy with a password manager.


👤 mediumsmart
Thank you for asking this. I signed up for the training trial and will pay for the duo plan after that to help make kagi viable.

google keeps its 0.0.0.0 pole position in my search engine array


👤 elashri
Kagi provides you with a key that you can use instead of normal login if you cannot login for any reason ( i.e Cooperate Machines). Also I don't think this is really a friction. Login will take a much less time than going through the google spam and SEO results (for one query)

👤 victorbjorklund
I really dont understand why someone would pay for a general search engine. I would never. But obviously people find value in it and are willing to pay for it. So seems viable as long as you can get enough such people to cover costs of crawling and indexing.

👤 CM30
It seems to be viable enough for them to run a successful business with. So in that sense it's viable.

But I suspect it'll always be a niche product, since most people don't see search engines as something worth paying for, even if the product does offer some stuff they might find useful. It's like selling a web browser or code editor or source control system in 2023, sure you might potentially have a small audience of die hard techies that could make use of it, but the majority of people will stick to the free but worse quality one simply due to the price alone.


👤 xulres
Like with every product you don't have to use it. I like it and don't have problems with login in even in some hellish corp nets. You are also on Hackernews if it annoys you to setup your devices one time before using the search engine... automate it. I just wonder what you do with your other software packages.

👤 frans
I don't understand why the majority of people are comfortable being part of the Google product and getting served search results that bring Google the most profit. Configuring the Kagi lenses [1] and personalized results [2] features makes the search results so much more useful that I couldn't live without them anymore.

When I'm looking into a specific topic, learning new features, or troubleshooting an issue, I put the results that Kagi provides in a separate window. I then work through this as a reliable to-do list for further investigation.

[1] https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/lenses.html

[2] https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/website-info-personalize...


👤 distract8901
Well, yes, when you use a service you pay for, you have to use some type of authentication.

You have a few options. You can log into each new device and save your session like a normal person. It takes only as long as required to physically enter the password.

You also have a "magic URL", which is just an OAuth token.

My phone has a search widget that doesn't support authenticated search engines, so I set up a custom engine and pointed it at my magic URL.

If you somehow really care about the two seconds it takes to log in, you could host a webpage that redirects to your magic URL. Then you and everyone else can use your Kagi account 'unauthenticated'


👤 carlosjobim
For the majority of connected people on this planet, Instagram is their first interaction and portal to the internet. And that service also requires registration and set-up. So I don't think it's such a big hurdle for those who want to use Kagi.

> why should I go through setting up all this settings to make a simple search query when I can simply use google without an account?

Why are you asking people to give you a reason? You are free to do as you please, the choice is yours.


👤 barrysteve
Kagi's search results are good, feels like google never died, to me.

It's really comfortable and easy to use for my desktop use case.

What makes me wobble about Kagi is about advertising on here with anonymized aggregated stats. He promises in the privacy policy to never share data (I'm paraphrasing, it's not exacty this wording) and then advertises with it.

It's not the advertising that bothers me, it just feels so needless to provide a sense of 'privacy comfort' and then provide a sense of 'wait you're gonna air my (anon) dirty laundry?'

Again not a big deal, but if he breaks his own rules (or suggests at it)... then he's not really committed and nor am I.

I know it's a small thing. I wouldn't mind 5yrs ago, but as everyone is so antsy about people playing by 'the rules' and constantly providing updates to software that doesn't need it, locking a relationship into place I didn't ask for... then the little things start to matter.


👤 slikrick
Not until they offer a privacy respecting way to pay like mullvad

👤 pschuegr
Yeah, TBH I feel like they should release a super-lightweight app that serves as a starting point for a search and then hands the results off to the local browser with whatever key set so that it knows who you are. This would significantly lower the barrier for people who don't know how to or don't feel like messing with extensions, etc.

Otherwise, two thumbs up for Kagi. I personally give zero fucks about Google's business model, but Google's search experience is in my opinion degrading very rapidly.