Agile is one of the few significant shifts in business where the board members are unaware of the creators and don't hire them in to consult authentically. I think only Kent Beck was hired by Facebook at a somewhat senior level, and Ken Schwaber spoke at Google a couple of times for mega money. It really should be a thing where every manifesto signatory is a consultant to big business at board level.
in my experience, agile/scrum is great - in theory.
in "the wild"/in pratcies its mostly implemented in a way, which "pleases lower & upper mgmt" but doesn't take into account the features necessary for the team to be able to work smoothly.
so: not agile/scrum need to be revisited, but the implementation of agile processes / scrum in companies/projects etc...
cheers, t.
ps.: and lots of companies want to do "scrum" with far to few people / small projects - mostly situations, where imho. kanban with a backlog would be sufficient and especially more effective.
At the same time, I have now done software engineering for over a decade, in many roles and teams, and I have never seen Agile or Scrum to lead to the development of a good piece of software. I guess we were using it wrong.
This does not really work as it does not address the root cause of poor performance, which can vary greatly.
It’s never worked.