Why is amd doing so much better, relatively, in gaming segment?
Is it because game development doesn't use CUDA?
Feel free to let me know if my premise itself is wrong.
When it was initially released it required a lot of interaction between NVIDIA and the developer to fine tune the model to the particular game, and most didn't care enough to do it. Now I think there are some ways for developers to mess around with DLSS on their own but due to the state of modern game development most simply don't care enough about it.
So a supposedly very large advantage of NVIDIA cards simply doesn't exist in most titles as of today(most titles do have the DLSS option in the settings, but in about 80% of the titles the differences are negligible).
I can also go buy an intel ARC GPU with 16GB vram, for an even decenter price.
For comparable prices to above, a moderately weak nvidia (3060, 12GB), used, probably for crypto mining, so warranty probably voided even on "2nd hand warranty" brands. If you need compute cheap, used nvidia. if you want current gen gaming for the same price, amd, and with a measured attitude, intel ARC.