The production values are very good. Audio, visuals, tight script. It comes across as professional and by the book.
It's different from the videos I watch on similar topics. The differences I felt are:
+ Your video has a strong fourth wall. It doesn't open with "Today, we are..." or "Welcome back..."
+ The pace is high. Two minutes in there had been more than a dozen different scenes. There have been at least half a dozen different pieces of hardware.
+ Two minutes in, I am guessing that the video will is about wireless charging. That's nearly a quarter of the way through the video.
I want to be clear, when I say "the video is not for me" I mean exactly that. "For me" is not a criticism. You don't know me, didn't know I existed, and didn't make it with the idea I was in the audience. I am not in the intended audience for most things.
So that's the big question.
Who is your intended audience?
Making videos for the algorithm is a local minimum and it looks to me like the video ticks all the boxes.
Maybe it's time for some hill climbing:
+ second person
+ slower
+ formally pedagogical (tell what you are going to say, say it, tell what you said).
+ good enough production
Or not. Good luck.
[edit: link added in case the references were unfamiliar] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill_climbing
Ok, only now do I read the clickbait title: run Doom
But you run Doom at 1-minute mark. Why am I still watching after 1-minute, idk. I'm guessing all your people drop off after 1m.