She keeps a tally of all the scams. The total is now over $67 billion.
Besides investment cash flow, I don't think there have been any revenue generating ventures that cater to customers outside the Web3 ecosystem.
The true web3 players will be traditional finance companies upgrading their settlement systems.
I am curious how people will answer your second question.
large multinational brands are dropping nft collabs often right now - adidas, tons of high fashion, etc. & many other other big brands are working on them behind closed doors
i don't think it's going anywhere, and most people are just building out tech and infra
I left 15 months later, but they're still going, just did an alpha release.
Because of my work being present on GitHub, I've been contacted by recruiters over email for similar positions several times this year.
I went to two conferences on blockchain and zero-knowledge. Everyone at these conferences seem like serious people working for funded companies, and everyone seems to be okay with there being no customers. It's a little surreal.
It seems that some of the early profit makers in the space are still sinking money into the hope of a future "after the crypto winter" bubble. There is a lot of zero-knowledge hype. Some of the startups that claim to use zero-knowledge cryptography simply aren't.
They just seem to be less about what was original called “web3” and more about applying crypto to… stuff.
Nearly all Web3 startups are fully remote, so once the CTO leaves they just sort of collapse of their own accord. CEO is usually a loony.
We're in long-term, so scams and hype are something that we try to ignore as we build for practical use cases. But yes, the days of free venture money are over. These are now flowing in the direction of a different two-letter hype.
Source: I am a founder of a web3 startup that has survived a couple of crypto winters.
I get the impression nobody takes the time to actually parse the word decentralization. It only means not centralized, but that applies to absolutely everything in the scheme. Somehow people get this confused and for whatever reason believe if anything is not fully centralized then all of it must be fully decentralized.
In order to achieve actual decentralization with online or web technologies consider this incomplete checklist:
* No DNS
* No identity manager
* No shared server. A server is fine so long as you are the only client that can access it as a server or other clients are currently known and prior authenticated (a peer).
* No root certificate or certificate authority or CRL.
* No blockchain
* No shared database or other shared services
Otherwise claims of decentralization are probably just scams to pilfer your data, steal your money, or mine crypto remotely using your hardware. Decentralization is still possible as I have proven it in a personal application of mine, but its very complicated and extremely different from how the web works.
Over time, this concept will find its way into many projects. Especialy into open source projects which try to make the web a better place.
For example, as soon as browsers support a DNS based on cryptographic proofs like ENS, other technologies which have URL based identities (like ActivityPub) will automatically support cryptographic identities. Which would bring it to projects like Mastodon and Bluesky automatically.
Hacker News just generally doesn’t keep up to date because they think crypto is scams. That’s like thinking generative AI is deepfakes.
It's the circle of hype... There'll be something else along shortly.
(Some of the surviving web3 startups literally seem to have rebranded into LLM startups.)
In the long run it will benefit everyone.
However we're probably entering the bull season and we'll see a new wave of web3 scam startups soon nevertheless.