This sounds very low to me, even if those are fully remote positions. As far as I know, this salary wouldn't attract strong talent even in medium cost-of-living countries (like Portugal/Spain).
Anyone has more insights around this decision? For example: - Are they targeting extremely low-cost of living countries? Have they seen more success with that strategy? - Will globalisation finally equalize developer salaries across the globe? - Do they offer something else which is unusually attractive?
Intrigued to learn more.
median salary for a developer in Spain is $30,000 a year[1], so 50-80k would easily place them in the upper 10% of the scale.
I think americans need to really reflect on how inflated american dev salaries are.
[1] https://www.payscale.com/research/ES/Job=Software_Developer/...
https://deep-ivy-ltd.breezy.hr/p/055a500d0e8701-ml-research-...
45-60k
● Very strong Python skills, with deep expertise in PyTorch, TensorFlow or JAX
● Very strong skills in recursive programming. Check out the Ivy Container class
45-60k would be a Wordpress developer in my opinion, I'd imagine deep expertise in ML cost a lot more.
But they get nowhere near the respect an investor of that amount would get. Asking to sign onerous ndas. Doing fizz buzz on a whiteboard. Etc.
One time I refused to sign an nda for an interview and the founder basically blew a gasket. Spent half the interview talking about how bad it was I wouldn’t sign it.
SV is an planetary anomaly. Hundreds of billions (if not more) of capital free to invest in highly risky undertakings. That's why you earn 200K or more. An enormous surplus of capital with a high tolerance for failure.
That type of capital simply does not exist anywhere else in the world. And this only strengthens the SV effect, like a gravitational force.
Trust me, it's not because Europeans have more holidays. Companies simply cannot afford to pay these salaries anywhere in the world except in SV. Because they quite simply don't have these types of budgets.
To put things in perspective, if you'd travel around the world and call out the number 200-300K/year, people everywhere will assume you own a factory or are some other huge deal. They most certainly will not think of a microservice developer.
I've interviewed "senior" engineers who I wouldn't hire into an internship, and I've interviewed regular (non-senior) engineers who are exceptional.
It also means different things to different companies. At a startup, a "staff engineer" might just be the best engineer on a team of 5-10, but at a big tech company it means a completely different thing. I've also worked with senior engineers at big tech companies who would be less productive than a new graduate in a 3 person startup.
Apply to a job description, not a job title.
It's sort of like when otherwise successful "name brand" organizations offer unpaid internships (let's not get in to whether that's legal or not.)
This selects for the type of people that can afford an arrangement like that.
Put another way, already wealthy founders, supported by wealthy investors, also want wealthy employees, or at least the demographic that fits already wealthy people.
You can literally read the job description.
Answer:no.
Source: I've read the descriptions.
> Intrigued to learn more.
They are just companies. They either don't have money, or have money and want to lowball (it's good time to lowball).
lol, you have no idea what you’re talking about
That’s a very typical salary range for developers in most parts of Europe. If your definition of “strong talent” means competing with top of market pay (FAANG etc) you’re right though.
"The average total compensation of a Software Engineer in Portugal is €39,094."
I guess the 100k or even 200k, or 300k starting meme finally died at a time of record inflation no less.
If they competed with companies who are paying at the 90th percentile they wouldn't even make it a year if they hired 1 person.
If, as some speculate, it's just part of the comp and equity is. The other, then it would have been the same last year.