In particular, if a stranger knocks on your door and you would like to open the door to talk to them, you could use this service to bring a police officer to supervise the interaction to make sure nothing bad happens.
Such a general service would require such a massive expansion of the police that even if you are in the demographic currently well-served by the police it would be no better than inviting another stranger (but guaranteed to be armed).
2. Why not just keep the door closed if you suspect such a thing? What could a stranger want that would be worth the hassle of getting a police officer that would be worth it? I personally never bother answer the doorbell unless there is a package coming I know I must sign for. Everyone else is selling some poor value service or product.
I’m struggling to understand the motivation.
I think if trust in society had fallen enough that people wanted a service like this, then people would not trust the police to provide it, and the government would not be able to afford to fund it.
Strangers that have an intention to knock on doors should go to the Police beforehand, state the reason why they want to knock on someone's door and be given a special ID and "license to knock".
When they knock on your door, they show you the ID and licence, that you can scan via a dedicated app that authenticates the person and uploads the date/time of the visit in a database[1] managed by the police, and you remain free to not let them in or open the door to them.
[1] or maybe a blockchain could be used instead