But I like it for another reason. It proves you can have an insanely cited paper (~10k citations) by summarizing the work of others in a clear concise manner. It proves there is academic value in not just churning out "novel" research, but by presenting existing facts in a new and useful light. It doesnt leave the reader working out the the (perhaps sometimes ego-driven) equation jumps. It holds your hand and walks you through the subject in a really refreshing way.
[1]http://www.ece.uprm.edu/~domingo/teaching/inel5309/On%20the%...
[1] https://files.ifi.uzh.ch/boehlen/Papers/modf174-dignoes.pdf
[2] https://illuminatedcomputing.com/posts/2017/12/temporal-data...
Why I consider the paper to be the best? The imply, the authorship, the flawlessness.
[1] bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf