If using an LLM as a co-founder is not completely feasible today surely it will be soon. We're clearly much closer to it being possible than impossible. What will this mean for the startup economy? You can imagine a world with more solo founders, less co-founder disputes, a world where founders need to only have expert-level specialty in 1 area because LLMs will fill in the rest of the knowledge gaps.
On the whole it looks like the cost of turning brilliant ideas into tangible products is quickly falling.
I think the question you could ask is whether having a co-founder (with all the +/-) brings something critical to the equation that an adviser, however knowledgeable, does not.
[p.s. above is ignoring the standing issue of a hallucinating chat bot, which is an entirely different issue.]
Aren't these the same observations made about GPT-3? That its hallucinations sound pretty good to non-experts on any given topic?
Here's 25+ more of the first GPT-4 enterprise customers:
when the day comes I am willing to have AI as a cofounder or advisor as legally applicable. in fact I am more comfortable sharing ideas with bot which does not judge me or remember every of my past failures or behaviours like how humans do.