The research momentum behind ChatGPT is in the open, widely understood, and has no meaningful IP protections. They’ve now demonstrated where the market is, and money will come in and stake out many different and competing positions. Several of those will probably eclipse everything we’ve seen in these last few weeks.
Microsoft, meanwhile, has come in and begun guiding them through product development and engineering as their own effort to stake such a position. Microsoft is reasonably good at this but has no monopoly on it either.
In any case — because of the Microsoft attachment, they’re no MySpace or Altavista and won’t simply wither away, but they’re basically just a vassal whose fate and glory is at the whim of their patron.
Apple is a hardware company and it's doubtful they will ever be a direct competitor.
Google is an AI powerhouse, but they are a mess internally and seem to be too terrified of their brand reputation to actually release any of their work as products. They have potential, but might fail to execute.
Amazon seem like a strong potential if they can build on their AWS products.
Meta is off chasing VR, so probably not unless they execute a big pivot. Lots of impressive researching coming out of them though.
Microsoft already seems to be in the lead with their investment in OpenAI and the speed they are pushing it into their products.
So if the LLM potential is really as big as it seems, some combination of these companies is probably going to own the market. Whether thats an extra 10 billion of market cap or 10 trillion of market cap remains to be seen. personally I have some small investments, but it's a single digit percent of my NW.
I've never worked at google, but I've worked for them and Meta, the data they have access to is unbelievable (and I'm sure I only saw a very small subset of it).
If they don't successfully make the paradigm shift then their dominance in search is at an end. (Especially with governments regulating search results like what's happening in Canada with bill C18)
I just don't see OpenAI scaling to the moon when the moat around their product is so shallow and disruptable. What is their long-term play besides having an API that can be replaced with by changing a POST request URL?
Both extraordinarily smart and hard working.
I really like Elon's anti-patent stance. SamA backpedaled a bit on the openness with OpenAI, but I wouldn't be surprised if that was a short term move and in the long run it will become more open again.
I think Elon is in the much better position because he sells physical objects.
I think OpenAI still has very existential risks to their business model. In the long run open source is an OOM cheaper way to create software than closed source, and as long as Apple keeps cranking out faster processors the open source community will be able to reproduce and exceed OpenAI's cloud offerings. I think SaaS may be more of a fad than people realize.
But Sam has diversified big with big bets on fusion and other things. I would expect he comes up with a business in the real world that has more of a moat than a business dependent on (c)opywrong law.
It's a fun competition to watch.
My money is definitely on Elon, but SamA is probably the next best entrepreneur in the game today.
OpenAI is currently the market leader but what is keeping them there? Their competitors have a lot of expertise and access to the compute needed.
If anything because OpenAI is more of an API provider than having their own end-users, any of their current customers could switch to another cheaper/better AI vendor without their end-users even knowing. Diminishing OpenAI's USP even further.