Currently I'm aiming for my first full-time job in over a decade and have a few concerns on how to best present myself as a strong self-learner with an interest in learning more at work. And also deal with adapting to a full-time schedule.
From 500 or so applications last year, 20-some interviews (all ending at different stages, there is no single "how far did I get" - sometimes it's 1 screening round, sometimes it's 1 screen + 3 tech rounds) and not a single offer yet. I generally want to get more feedback such as the following:
"You didn't get a couple problems right, but you have potential and we are going to give you a chance"
"We are going to give you a contract to hire to prove yourself"
"You have shown yourself to be a self-starter, so you can just learn on the job"
I am applying to junior roles as well, so the thought is that it's expected that I shouldn't be a master at anything. Why junior, though? Wasn't my first job more than 10 years ago? Well, remember that I have just been hopping back and forth between contract work and no work, almost since the beginning. It is not a typical career.
Am I limiting myself too much with only junior and mid-level FT jobs?
If I interview at SWE jobs and nearly every professional tells me, "you don't have what we consider SWE at my job" should I drop the "software engineer" and just call myself "web developer"?
I have worked a few jobs where I had the title of "software engineer" and others where I was called "web developer". But from what most SWE jobs actually expect you to do nowadays, I consider myself lacking many skills that would place me beyond just a "coder" to an "engineer". I know, I know, don't sell your skills short. But that won't stop other programmers from imposing their own standards onto you.
I apply to bog-standard mid-tier companies 95% of the time. Maybe even mid-tier is still too high a bar because of all the rejections. Strangely, though, my resume sometimes attracts FAANG recruiters, even though, again, I only make it through 1 or 2 interview rounds.
I suggest that you work round the problem, rather than expecting them to see sense.