Does this mean that they were only good at solving leetcode questions ?
Does this mean engineers from MIT,Stanford were only good at solving SAT questions ?
Don't give me strawman arguments and personal attacks,instead provide some valid counter arguments
REFERENCE: READ THIS ARTICLE Zuckerberg’s Metaverse App on 'Quality Lockdown' as Even Employees Won’t Use It.
https://decrypt.co/111483/zuckerberg-meta-metaverse-quality-lockdown-employees-wont-use-it?amp=1
Think of a movie. A movie has many specialists such as cinematographers, editors, sound engineers, makeup artists, grips, costume designers, colorists, casting director, actors, etc. These people can be great at their specialized work but if the script of the movie is bad it will be a bad movie despite that.
With that being said, Facebook had quite a culture of dogfooding the many years I worked there. I don’t know if that’s still the case, but I would imagine it is. In this case, the metaverse was a stark departure from the core Facebook product suite, and its importance was dictated top-down. I could see a lot of engineers uninterested in engaging beyond the necessary because of that. Contrary to Zuck’s belief, it is important to work to get employee buy in on a vision, otherwise people won’t put real effort toward achieving that vision. A lot of C suite tend to think they can steer the ship anywhere they want and employee morale or pushback is just an irrelevant externality.
Feel free to critique this as a strawman, but I personally use very little of the software I develop and I guess many/most devs are in the same boat.
You haven't provided an argument to counter. "Nobody drives the speed limit. Are people only interested in texting and fornication?"