HACKER Q&A
📣 themodelplumber

Rolling Release Distro, or LTS w/ Backports?


I want to upgrade one of my desktop systems here that runs (X)ubuntu 20.04. It's been solid so far, no complaints.

However, I've been trying rolling release distros like PCLOS and Manjaro on other computers, and I like the way they provide newer software, while they also seem to work really well so far.

I saw a Youtube comment where someone recommended Ubuntu + backports as an alternative to a rolling release distro.

This is tempting because a lot of third-party proprietary software companies support Ubuntu really well.

(I'd probably try Kubuntu as it's been a while, but I'm thinking the question is generally the same for *buntu.)

So: What should I know if I try LTS + backports instead of a rolling release? What am I missing? Is it worth a try?

And are there other Debian-based distros I should consider, rolling or no? (Thinking of using apt-clone to help with the migration, and generally liking how Debian works...)

Thanks!


  👤 pasdechance Accepted Answer ✓
Not the biggest distrohopper on the planet, but I have been using GNU/Linux since around 2006 so I will throw my hat in the ring with some comments and answers I have seen to similar questions over the years.

* Straight-up Debian is not always recommended as a desktop distro. I use Debian Testing as my desktop distro, though, and have had no problems. I did use Debian Sid, which works like a rolling distro in the sense that it does not need to be reinstalled for major version updates. I managed to mess it up during an update by carelessly pressing 'y' without reading what was written in the terminal.

* I have used Manjaro in the past, and it was fine. Just take it easy with packages from the AUR and everything will be OK. And remember: Manjaro != Arch. I tried Arch and used it for a long time. Not a single issue. Quite seamless, great wiki.

* I tried MX for quite some time. It might be worth looking at because you can access some newer packages through backports and the built-in tools can be helpful setting this up. I found it to be just as fast and seamless as Arch. MX is semi-rolling and Debian-based.

* Right now, I see a lot of people talking about Fedora as a great desktop Linux experience. It is one of the few major distros that I have never tried. Several of the big Linux YouTubers recommend it for Desktop use.

If I were you, I would stick with what works until it doesn't work. If you keep digging around, you'll start spending more time keeping your dotfiles in order than actually enjoying the distro. I stuck with Ubuntu for years until my hardware couldn't keep up with the demands of the DE. I lived in a minimal, tiling window manager for a few years. Like you, I like how Debian and apt work. So, my first pick for you would be MX.

Other options:

Bunsen Labs https://www.bunsenlabs.org/ (very light DE)

Linux Mint https://linuxmint.com/ (good transition from Ubuntu, loved by many)

Pop!_OS https://system76.com/pop

Neon https://neon.kde.org/ (if you want latest KDE)