But what I wish for in this discussion is an approach where we think in one other's perspective, where we look into things we normally might not notice.
I believe I have a very naive view of this concept, or philosophy, or whatever you wish to call it, and would like to know more.
But if we consider that definition, then yes, there are many problems. They range from anything from physical to psychological needs. To feeling valued by society. To feeling fulfilled in relationships. All are "problems" IMO.
Because human beings exist in a social context, many of these problems boil down to a social contract between the individual and society. And discussions around the evolving nature of that contract in a way to minimize suffering is essential. With various philosophical problems like whether one groups increased suffering is OK if it minimizes average suffering.
For example, is it OK that we minimize the suffering of many in the near term by producing carbon? Knowing there may be longer term issues and externalities?
Is a war that will cause short term suffering OK if it liberates a group of people and may cause a decrease in longer term suffering?
Genes have errors, leading to cancer and mental illness. We war over resources and ideologies because we are running software that derives from vicious apes.