I find myself easily distracted reading any long form content on a screen. The temptation to check email or social media is strong.
I also prefer to read print materials when I am alone sitting at a coffee shop or a lunch counter or riding the train.
I feel more aware of my surroundings. People tend to engage me more, ask me what I’m reading etc. than if I have my face buried in my phone. It feels less antisocial.
The experience just feels qualitatively different. When I’m reading print, some part of my mind feels—in a pleasant way—that it is in the physical not digital world.
My print subscriptions: Foreign Affairs, New Yorker, New York Review of Books.
I still faithfully subscribe to two: Circuit Cellar [1] and Maximum PC [2]. Love reading each edition, and hope they continue to exist for a long time.
[1] https://circuitcellar.com/
[2] https://www.magazinesdirect.com/az-magazines/6936599/maximum...
Private Eye is a hardcore investigative-journalism outlet, arguably unique in the country. It's very info-dense (despite dedicating roughly half the space to humorous content), so reading it online would be too hard for me. Tbh i don't even know if they have an online version (they do have an occasional podcast, "Page 94").
MCN is a weekly tabloid about motorbikes. I just like to read it while I have breakfast, with the brain only half-awake. The "ooh shiny" ogling of new bikes benefits from larger-size pictures. It has a digital equivalent (which I also pay for) but I go there only when I want to keep something for the long run (trip suggestions etc). It is occasionally too full of barely-misguided ads, but that's par for the course in what is effectively a small and expensive hobby niche.
Boardgames - https://senetmagazine.com/ Psychedelics - https://doubleblindmag.com/ Cooking - https://www.americastestkitchen.com/cooksillustrated Puzzles - https://gamesmagazine-online.com/ World transformations - https://www.noemamag.com/
The main issue I have is periodicity: for most magazines, a weekly frequency is way too much in this day and age. It creates clutter in the home, and editorially, it incentivizes the addition of filler and spam content. The New Yorker can do this because they sell a lot of ads and act as a guide to local events.
But I think Businessweek and The Economist could benefit from going twice-monthly. Nobody's going to their websites for instant news and analyses, so a slightly longer gap between issues could allow for their articles to take on a much greater depth and nuance.
Many of my clients advertise in glossy magazines and many of the stories I shoot go into limited-run luxury fashion magazines that sell in bookshops for >€30.
Though the industry has been changing for a long time, I knew things were different and that the cynicism had become unsustainable when very few people actually read / bought / subscribed to the magazines for which we worked. Few people believed in the product enough to support its ideal form.
Also, 600px-wide jpegs in an endless flow destroyed photography, but whatever.
Why? I enjoy breaks from screens. I'd love to find something like the old NatGeo, TVGuide, or Reader's Digest. If anyone has recs, please let me know.
I kinda miss computer games magazines of the 90s, because they were... nice, in a way that has been lost. The print magazines now have many drawbacks versus online publications but the online publications are also not like the magazines.
It’s not like the puzzle “magazines” that are in the magazine section of most stores now, it’s way more than that. It used to occasionally show up at my local Barnes and Noble, but I haven’t seen it there for a while.
For professional reading its probably a different use case than most here but I subscribe to NEJM, a nature reviews journal and another medical journal in my specialty and find it much easier selectively and focus on browsing through abstracts and articles this way. If am taking notes I prefer digital to take screenshots.
I stayed at a German guest house where I was the youngest person there at dinner time by at least 30 years once. Interesting experience. One thing I really liked was they slipped a sheet with headlines, local weather under your door every morning. I've contemplated recreating that and having my printer it every morning...
In contrast I read only physical books, no e-books.
I'm a bit of an edge case though, I'm a native English speaker but have lived in non-English speaking countries since 2004. Access to digital English content is just more convenient, and cheaper. Plus, although this has never been a conscious reason, ecologically a print subscription would be worse.
A worth while mention out of print (truly inspirational and excellent quality production)
Modern Farmer
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_Farmer_(magazine)
And if you have obtainium, there’s Jane’s Defense https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane's_Defence_Weekly
Curation - yes, I could probably find similar stories on the web and read them, but a print magazine does the discovery and brings them all together for me in a way that a search engine or news aggregator doesn't/chooses not to. When browsing news sites, I find myself only selecting/reading articles based on their title and slug-line (which is the entire purpose of click-bait titles) whereas with a magazine/print publication, I'll read it cover-to-cover, exposing me to stories and points of view that I would otherwise miss. I've also found that good long-form journalism appears to be a dying art in the online world, but maybe that's on me for the sites I visit.
Focus - A magazine doesn't try and grab my attention with animation, video and other distractions. Yes they run ads, but (in the periodicals I read) they are generally full page and not halfway through the sentence you are reading. Print ads are expensive, so in my experience generally only promote high-end or luxury products targeting a perception of the magazine reader, rather than the last thing the reader searched for/emailed/said out aloud in front of their home speaker. I can also read through an article end-to-end without being pulled down a rabbit hole of links and references. Reading once again becomes a purposeful activity, without sitting in front of a machine that could easily switch from a book to a TV, to a video game in seconds.
Texture - there is something about picking up a book or magazine (especially higher end publications that print on quality paper stock) that I don't think will ever be emulated by a tablet or an e-reader. I'm sure I read somewhere that the touch and even smell of paper in your subconscious helps your brain store information longer term. Also, I love great typesetting and layout, things that online ads pretty much ruin for most sites.
Monocle Magazine - https://monocle.com/magazine/
Hey Gents (Now Softer Volumes) - https://softervolumes.com
The Smith Journal - (sadly now out of print)
Though, the only one I actively subscribe to right now is a famous Russian magazine[1] that's analogous to NatGeo
I've ended up renewing: High Country News (monthly), Overland Journal (quarterly), and Backwoods Home (quarterly)
I find my iPad to be sufficient if I want to kick back on the couch and read. I'd love to grab a large form e-Ink tablet but they're neither fast enough, nor cheap. ($600 for a Boox, what? I can get an iPad for $400 that is faster and more versatile and has more application support). But it's getting there.
traditional "print magazines" in digital form, yes. I love the magazines in Apple News. I still read Macworld, Wired and others. I think I read more magazines now because of Apple News. I don't have the room at home for dead tree media.
Fantastic publication. Great journalism that doesn't get bogged down in its own politics.
I was tempted by another which was behind a paywall recently. Maybe the Economist.
I've a couple of quarterly magazines too, these are literary or niche publications which have been going from well before the internet.
In the past I subscribed to New Scientist but it doesn't interest me now.
AD, Vogue, The New Yorker as of now for me.
Buy individual print from time to time based on pictorial content
I have a kid now, so if I’m paying for the New Yorker I want it to be available to them too if they come across it.
There’s simply no reason to be wasting trees and energy like that.