However, I also know that HackerNews prides itself in editing the title and URL of posts as a way of improving content quality.
It is then unclear to me why we're in this middle ground. If the most desirable link is a non-paywalled version, and if that is allowed and supported by this community, then perhaps moderation should be updating URLs to reference non-paywalled versions and we should be submitting non-paywalled versions. If that is morally objectional then I question the widespread support of linking as an initial reply.
Thoughts?
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...
>It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds.
>In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so.
... more at the FAQ.
Often the paywalled site is the original content, which is why it's encouraged to lead with that.
Many paywalls were circumvented by a simple procedure, disabling the java script, but sites have slowly become more guarded using other means.
I only wish there was a means to search the web, and turn off all paywalled sites from results or advertising.