- If I work on social media and I use ChatGPT to improve my writing/be more creative, I would definitely not use ChatGPT if Twitter suddenly starts to label my tweets as "ai-generated"
- If I'm working on my Phd thesis and I use ChatGPT to better organize my writing (e.g., because perhaps I'm not a native English speaker), but the university I'm submitting my Phd to is paying ChatGPT to analyze my text and see if there is any watermark, well, then I won't use ChatGPT to begin with
- And many more examples where ChatGPT is used to publish content
So, I don't really understand the "feature": if ChatGPT introduces watermarking without the possibility to disable it, wouldn't they be shooting themselves in the foot? Who's going to use watermarked ChatGPT? Very few people.
I bet the translation destroys whatever watermark is introduced in the original message.
With chatGPT, you are getting rid of so much bs writing so why keep the bs writing?