The original quote is from Aaron Swartz [1]
> What is the most important thing you could be working on in the world right now? ... And if you're not working on that, why aren't you?
[1] https://www.azquotes.com/quote/1202481
And I started asking, "What are the important problems of your field?" And after a week or so, "What important problems are you working on?" And after some more time I came in one day and said, "If what you are doing is not important, and if you don't think it is going to lead to something important, why are you at Bell Labs working on it?" ... If you do not work on an important problem, it's unlikely you'll do important work.
It is the main idea behind his lecture/essay "You and your Research", which is worth reading: https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.pdf or watching: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1zDuOPkMSw
I was working on this as a startup, we did have some good results, but the challenge was to take it at a bigger scale. Unfortunately underserved schools/parents just don't have the spending priority nor the awareness on how important great education is, making it hard to make a profitable startup out of the idea. My next direction is to take it as a non-profit organization, and so I'm striving to start a different business which I can live off and hopefully cross-subsidy this non-profit idea. My journey is still long way to go :(
Fueled mostly by omnipresent ragebait media targeted directly at our lizard brain.
Things are better than ever and yet our attention is mostly spent on what’s wrong and who we can blame for it.
Look at how utterly dystopian the average sci-fi book/show/movie is. As tech and its makers continue to grow in influence, is it any wonder that the world seems to resemble Black Mirror more each day?
A friend and I are addressing this problem. We’ve started by building a community to envision positive futures: https://reddit.com/r/TheFutureIsGood
We invite other optimistic builders to submit ideas for good future that are almost inevitable given all the progress we’ve made! We’re using AI generative art to materialize these visions for now, with traditional art also being considered.
Thanks for the great prompt and opportunity to plug a creative project.
Although there are lots of therapies which claim to do this, I don't believe that most of them work very well. We've hardly begun to recognize this problem, let alone solve it. But once you start to recognize it, you see that its effects are so profound that little else is of primary importance.
I don't know the solution, but am trying to "work on it" through e.g. donations & vegan advocacy - I think reducing the abuse of animals in factory farms is a "low-hanging fruit" for reducing suffering & ecological problems - it's usually much more efficient to eat plants directly instead of feeding them to animals.
In your wallet, a $5 bill is a capability, you can't accidentally give away your car by handing someone $5. It stands alone. There's no way in a computer to just give a program access to ONE file, at run-time.[1]
Because we don't have capabilities, our computers have to blindly trust code, which is why we have virus scanners, which can't actually work in all cases.[2][3]
So, in effect, we can't trust our computers. Which means we effectively must ride the upgrade/security updates treadmill to try to stay ahead. Which forces things like the Python 2/3 breakage into our lives. The amount of badness from the simple inability to do what you could previously do with an IBM PC XT with dual floppy diskettes is maddening to me.
But I keep pushing, and trying to figure out ways to make the case, and help raise awareness. I hope it helps. Otherwise I could be learning about kinematic mounts[4] or something else fun.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capability-based_security
[1] I know about app-armor which isn't really a capability based secure system.
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem
Am I working on it? I guess I don't know how to best do it in terms of my abilities, opportunities, and impact (writing? nonfiction or fiction? research? if so how?) and also feel pushed out of the loop in some ways that I've tried.
It's mostly directed at women and girls. The potential pool comprises half of humanity.
Is it coincidence that women still struggle for parity with men? That STEM, leadership, and governance roles are still dominated by men? That society expects women to sexualize themselves - even in subtle ways that qualify as 'normal'?
Feminists have long argued that the crises humanity now faces are the consequences of a patriarchal society: competition, industry, exploitation... What if they're right? What if this really is the result of an unbalanced civilization?
I'm guessing most of the readers here are male. Go and talk to your female partner or relatives - too many will have a one degree connection to a victim of sexual abuse. That is shocking and dismaying.
We should be furious. But sexual violence and abuse is an intimate crime that usually happens in private. By its very nature, it crowds the victim with feelings of shame. It's embarrassing for others to talk about. Yet the consequences are devastating and far reaching; chronic sexual abuse absolutely affects development (I have a citation, but not with me at this moment).
War related sexual violence is a vast, unacknowledged, collateral crime with victim numbers comparable to military casualties: gang rape, maybe on multiple occasions, sometimes with forced pregnancy, sometimes with genital mutilation - how does one recover from that? How does a society deal with that?
Sexual violence and abuse are endemic the world over; not specific to any culture or society (again, I have citations). This suggests it's a flaw within humanity itself...
What am I doing about it?
At the moment, I'm working with the author of this unique book: https://www.consentcollective.com/courage to produce translations into other languages. It's free to read online, and book sales enable the author to keep working on, arguably, the most important problem in the world.
Solving this problem area is my core focus. I want every human being on Earth to have a voice in controlling their destiny. I want everyone to determine where their public fund contribution should go (if they so desire), who should represent them (if anyone), and be able to fully audit the entire trail of government spending / lawmaking / legal precedent/ contracting / resource planning -- all in an accessible way.
I want people to engage with the governments of Earth directly, or voluntary cede their voice to someone that they believe represents their value -- while always retaining the power to take back their voice. This is a form of Liquid Democracy.
Cooncidentally, I believe this same system is the key to AGI. It is essentially a type of mass cluster consensus of neurons. Each human brain -- a node in the network -- is an Earth neuron. With ~8 billion humans, if connected in an optimal way, reducing latency and enabling any neuron comms with any other neuron, without any censorship nor friction, a mass higher intelligence forms. The tech stack enabling this intelligence can also be utilized with synthetic neurons.
Although I believe this will cascade into solving every other problem (if you organize minds properly with todays resources, we can trivially solve every conceivable immediate problem we collectively face. That is a fact), I approach this in a relaxed and nonchalant fashion at my own pace. I have relatively no resource allocation in society and have little desire to pursue that in the confines of existing systems, so if others don't value this dream, I have plenty of time still.
If I had a stable spot in the mountains far away from people and well supplied, I'd have this built within 5 years. It is sad to live in a time where you can't just chill by a river in nature without the sounds of engines, roads, planes, or other distractions, and all the places you can do this are owned by someone / have time limits as public land.
A man can dream.
A few of my family members have had health issues since birth and the amount of paperwork my family has been constantly filling out for decades is extremely overwhelming. And this is all extra paperwork added to the normal amount coming from work, the bank, college, car insurance, etc. Even simple forms such as renewing your drivers license add up when there are tens or hundreds of other similar forms every year.
One seemingly low hanging fruit is the time waste of copying the same information over and over when filling out these forms. In 2023, you would think that this part would have been solved by now, but I don't know of any tools with this functionality. I wonder if the complexity of PDF files is one reason that no tools currently exist to solve this problem.
This is mostly a rant because I still cannot figure out any good solutions to this, nor am I actively working on it aside from thinking the problems through in my free time. New technology might be able to solve the problem of copying similar info between forms, but I wonder if it can only be solved at the government level. And I have no idea how to go about solving that because its not like all paperwork is bad; I can understand the need for it in most cases. I just feel like the action of filling out forms should not be such a overwhelmingly large stressor in modern life.
I would love to hear other people's opinions on this. I feel like if there could be any solution that allows average people to spend less time filling out and worrying about paperwork would be a massive benefit on our mental health.
they are man's best friend, therefore anything else should take a back seat
essentially, we grow refineries for all manner of chemicals which are extracted much like canola oil or other such industrial by products of farming. except that we would be refining different complex chemicals. Additionally, in the same vein, development of photosynthesis organic batteries which are like plants and which store solar into chemical and then can extract like a battery the electrical power and the plant then breathes and converts the chemicals
So that the human society can move through the Great Filter and become a galactic species eventually.
ChatGPT: "The theory of everything (TOE) is a hypothetical single, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical framework of physics that fully explains and links together all physical aspects of the universe. TOE theories aim to provide a single theory that describes the fundamental physical interactions and principles of the universe, and to combine the general theories of relativity and quantum mechanics into one unified theory. It is also sometimes referred to as the "ultimate theory of the universe." While many theoretical physicists believe that a TOE is possible, it is currently not known whether such a theory exists or if it can be discovered."
The benefit:
Incentivizing good behavior in municipalities and corporations while disrupting the insurance market.
Why I didnt do it:
Met with a number of big wigs in the market and realized I didnt have the energy at this point in my career to raise money to build a two headed market.
most important problem in the world right now: how to avoid climate-change
and (sadly) nope, i'm not working on it :)
I have written about it here: https://loan-free-ed.neocities.org
[0] https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/P5k3PGzebd5yYrYqd/the-hammin...
Since I posed the "important" issue, I'll answer both. Though there is a common thread. The common thread is health. Health is a word with a relatively vague definition, but nonetheless a powerful concept. Our society is a complex system and healthy can be a description of individuals, groups, the whole of the population, and the environment. For now let's consider the health of the whole human population. Even if we now have scoped health, it's not hard to see how impossible it would be define it precisely, because as the population and culture evolves, so must our idea of health. If we optimize for only a few metrics (e.g. max profit and minimum death) we hurt the dynamism/holism of the system. There isn't a single set of metrics that actually covers everything and it's dynamism. Despite our difficulty defining it, we know it when we see it, and this brings us to the most fundamental problem in society.
Most fundamental: What is health for society? How do think about and map physical, emotional, mental, and spiritual health into comprehensible value systems, and then map those to policies. Instead of relying on static definitions, what are some of the perhaps more dynamic markers of health? How do we incorporate new technologies into our concept of societal health?
Most urgent: What are the areas that are currently causing, or have massive risk of causing, "disease" or suffering in society? Climate change, bio-tech risks, failing food systems, authoritarian drift, education (decreased sense-making capacity and the degradation of the information commons). Those are my big ones, but there are others.
Much of my thinking is influenced by Daniel Schmachtenberger (though no affiliation). If these ideas resonate with you, check him out on the youtubes. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=daniel+schmacht...
Am I working on it: I am studying systems science generally, I work for an educational nonprofit, and I'm experimenting in increasing my own health capacities and doing some teaching and coaching others.
I'm not working on any of the above 3 problems, because I have to pay for housing, I have to pay for healthcare, and I have to save for the education for my kids.
Survival.
>Are you working on it?
Most of the time.
Too bad that takes as much work as it once did to provide remarkable prosperity.