I am just curious. There are a couple of products (You, Perplexity.ai, and Neeva (soon)) that have recently launched a feature that summarizes articles and spits out answers. I'm wondering how creators, particularly news outlets, will get paid if search engines start taking their traffic?
Maybe completely new business models will need to be implemented?
I'll just paste the text he sent me when I asked basically the same question.
"I'll worry about this when AI can watch baseball and make sense of a manager getting ejected."
I think "news summaries" are going to get blown up by AI reading all of the other news articles that exist about something, but ... someone has to actually write the first draft. Back to sports: we're a long way from an AI watching a ballgame and understanding why, exactly, a manager had his pitcher hit the next batter, or why a certain homerun was so crucial.
News outlets have already died. What exists today is not news. Those aren't journalists. The AI can already write better.
> Yahoo has announced that it will be acquiring Summly, a startup that aims at summarizing web content into a digestible format more fit for mobile devices. In a nutshell, what Summly does is let you pick your news sources from a set of pre-packaged categories or your favorite website. From there the app will show you the latest stories summarized in up to 400 characters and presented in a cleanly designed interface.
I don't think this did any damage to the news publishing industry. Article summaries have existed forever: most of the free blogosphere does anything besides add their 2 cents to stories broken by the larger news outlets.
[0]https://www.techspot.com/news/52054-yahoo-acquires-news-summ...
The only way out (especially if advertising is no longer paying the bills) is to align the incentives and get end-users to pay for the content directly. If ads no longer pay the bills, there will be an incentive for all publishers to work together on a frictionless, interoperable micropayments service so end-customers can pay to replace the lost ad revenue. Paywalls will be erected to prevent search engines from accessing (and then republishing summarised versions) of the content for free.
Some parasitic trash will definitely go out of business but that's for the better. There's currently a lot of content and companies out there who only survive because people can't ask for a refund on an ad view - by the time the user realises they've been tricked into clicking on trash, the creator already got paid. This model wouldn't work in a micropayments-based world.