https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33755016
Honestly, it was pretty concerning to be able to locate an old account of mine. Given the potential danger of being doxxed, it would be very nice to be able to delete our accounts and old comments. I think HN is one of the only sites that doesn’t allow you to do that in an automated fashion. Can we request that feature be implemented? I worry that people are building tools to reverse engineering people’s true identities and it seems like an important feature to keep users safe from physical and commercial harm.
"Can I delete my account?
We try not to delete entire account histories because that would gut the threads the account had participated in. However, we care about protecting individual users and take care of privacy requests every day, so if we can help, please email hn@ycombinator.com. We don't want anyone to get in trouble from anything they posted to HN. More here [1]."
If your threat model is people cancelling you for controversial statements - I don't think there's anything to worry about. If your concern is governments or stalkers coming after you - then deleting your account probably won't solve the issue because they'll be able to access archived versions. These actors don't need to "prove" you said something to anyone but themselves. In this case the solution is just not to post anything sensitive regardless of the name you publish under.
YC has multiple in-house lawyers. They're not going to risk their business over this. However, I'm unaware of any law that requires the process be completely automated.
Are they obliged to delete the comments according to laws like GDPR?
In an email to hn@ycombinator.com, I wrote:
> ”I understand the user interface doesn't provide for comment removal, but with all due respect it's only a matter of time before that policy contributes to the imprisonment or even death of some of your users.”
> ”It's too late to be entirely safe from historical comments but we have no idea how much the threshold for what is truly dangerous to have said on the internet will change going forward. Even a small decrease in the personal risk going forward is important to me.”
HN’s response was no, because that would “gut the threads the account had participated in”. He then suggested there was upcoming an account renaming feature. Obviously, that feature would do nothing to alleviate the doxxing concerns brought up by the OP.
It was very disappointing.
YC literally put a higher value on maintaining old forum threads than reducing risk former users faced being detained, beaten or killed by religious or political organizations.
HackerNews leadership have chosen to not allow anyone to delete content after a period.
Regardless, it would be pointless given how easy it is to scrape this website (on purpose).
I think there are many other archives such as one posted above hosted by Google's bigquery.
a better strategy would be to divert your writing to something new and different, defeating simple stylometry analysis.
rss feeds and easy site scraping has long leaked all your stylometry data which long ago was leached up.
What is the point of deleting your HN account, if multiple third party copies all ready exist?
By preventing users from closing accounts, HN is deliberately blurring the lines of who is still active on the platform and who isn't.
Lastly, if it really turns out there is a reliable method to associate HN accounts with a real-world identity, HN will get in trouble with the GDPR.
Really guys, leave the comments up if you have to, but give people a way to remove their account from it.
I participate at Flyertalk, and a good friend of mine had a major falling-out with them a few years ago.
As a leaving gift, he wrote a script to edit every single comment he'd ever made over the [many] years he'd been contributing, to remove his many many thousands of comments.
As a result, there are thousands of removed comments, and of course, many thousands of threads which are, well, gutted.
In our new GDPR-aware world, isn't that his right?
The algorithms used are also not transparent.
Whether that's good or bad is a moot point to discuss while people are to stupid to even get the basics.
Let's talk about whether the cia could scape archive.org and use stylometry on single comments on a system we don't even get the basics on.