When I write papers, usually in collaboration with others, it is far easier to scribble in the margins, draw lines to reorganize sections, etc. And you get a better sense of how the paper will look once published.
and ... it is nice to have a break from staring at a screen and being able to sit on a couch, etc. Yes, I do use an iPad, but paper is nice. Interested to see how the new Amazon Kindle Scribe will feel when it is released, mind you it's only B&W.
I would also add: cross referencing a printed out paper (or book!) is much faster and easier than on a computer. I think this has something to do with the physicality of the medium. If I’m deep in a paper or a book, it begins to feel like an extension of my body. I can simultaneously track where many different things are in the document just by feel. Over time, you get experience with papers and books you’re well acquainted with. For some reason, this process just never seems to go as far with something on a computer screen. I think it has something to do with spatial memory in people being so powerful, and manipulating an object physically being more keyed to spatial memory than manipulating something abstractly on a computer.
- When I'm teaching, if I have typed up notes I'll print out a copy to refer to in class. I can easily circle mistakes during class (to be corrected later), and I don't have to worry if I get chalk all over them.
- For the reason that GlanFabien said. If I want to read a paper carefully (this includes a draft of my own work), I'll often print it out. This lets me scribble notes in the margin, take it with me easily, and it puts distractions one step further away.
Conversely, if I just want to skim a paper I will just read it on a computer or tablet.
- If I'm traveling I will print out copies of airline and hotel reservations and things like this. These aren't really necessary, I'm mostly just hedging my bets in case something goes wrong.
Conversely, most things I don't print. For example I just read 250+ job applications, each of which comes with eight documents at a minimum (CV, statement of research plans, rec letters, etc.) and I printed none of them.
I print the end of term maths exams. And handouts we want to discuss and annotate with comments.
Paper is an unbeatable technological medium for some things.
Problems arise when dismissive techno-neophile administrators fail to maintain the printers. So I keep some spare toner aside for an invincible 2005 Canon desktop laser hidden in a lab.
So why not a tablet? Infinite battery life and easy crossreferencing, e.g. just put page 2, 15 and 47 next to each other -> would need three tablets. Furthermore writing on glass still is different, even matte glass.
So while more and more parts of work are "digital", for some parts you still want "analog".
Why lots of people do: for prose projects, seeing a printed out version of the thing is superior for proofreading, editing, etc. The context switch helps break you out of your “this is text I wrote so I can’t see the errors in it” rut.
Also, reading long documents is still easier on paper than on screens——the screen alternatives all still kinda suck. iPad and the like have glare, hard to read outside, etc. remarkable and kindle and other e-ink devices are just filthy with compromises, like, kindle screens are all too small when most documents come formatted in letter size pdf, remarkable has no backlight and in addition the remarkable 1 at least is agonizingly slow and the software is utter shite.
I put up with the iPad/remarkable mess personally because (a) I refuse to own a printer at home, since the damned things never work right, (b) I also hate clutter and already have too much paper generated by others sitting around in piles, (3) pdfs and such are much easier to travel with
Can outlast file format
Children also love printouts and worksheets.
But I still print when I want to show stuff to other people, or for lab bench protocols