And also, what would repel you from applying at an early-stage startup?
Dilution is obviously necessary for external investment, but more than once I have seen early employees screwed out of valuable equity by the following scenario: once the company is getting traction and revenue, the founders take a huge round of funding. All existing shares and grants are diluted, but the VC investors give the founders a "make-up" grant (or whatever; the mechanism isn't important) that keeps them whole—while early employees, who aren't part of the negotiations, have their stakes reduced to tiny fractions of what they were. This in spite of many years of sweat and struggle and overwork equal to what anybody else in the company put in. So basically they are discarded when no longer useful.
For anybody actually considering joining an early startup as an employee, make sure you get this in your employment contract, and get your own lawyer to review it. "Trust me bro" means nothing in 2-3 years if $millions are on the line.
Having said that, the above reasons work for junior people only. By now I have gained enough experience to be a cofounder, so I'm not likely to work with no pay and no equity - by no equity I mean anything less than 10%, and no pay = anything less than 150k.
Lots of equity. (If you’re pre-funded you can’t offer good salary)
> And also, what would repel you from applying at an early-stage startup?
Not having lots of equity. Lots of pre-revenue roadmaps instead of figuring out how to charge early. (Unless it’s a social network)
Then I'd build on that in future hiring and interviews, and get other employees involved as a way of building the collection of motivated folks who can soak it in and enjoy our vibe.
This organization in a pre-funded state and wanting employees should have an amazing vibe, no excuses. But it doesn't have to be _everybody's_ amazing vibe. It has to be something positive, reasonably energetic, and then the other stuff can follow as suits the situation: Geeky, specialized, diverse in a particular way, and so on.
If I somehow ended up as a hiring candidate I'd be doing so much backgrounding on the organization that I'd have a full outline of everything I'd be getting from it every day I was there, and right through its implosion if needed. Really wish I had done this in the dot com era!
Repellent to me, to give an example, would be a cultural mismatch based on factors that weren't accessible to me before interviewing, but which should have been. For example if I arrive on site with no accessible context to mull over beforehand, and the environment is extremely particular in a given way, that's really awkward to have to work through and can indicate an important but missed connection already.
"Particular" could be: Most people here WFH except you, and it's a warehouse in a sketchy area; we are divided into two teams, and you'll be on the one that's more workaday and has to stand up much of the day; we have a warm-greetings environment and nobody is WFH because they all love being together, etc.
Anyway. Just some thoughts, hope they can be helpful.
- Empowerment to get things done
- A pursuit of legitimate business opportunity (repellent would be craptocurrency, spamware)