The terms feel fairly benign but I’m also inclined to kindly reject to sign it. I am a California resident.
What do you think, how should I approach this issue?
Earlier this year I was interviewed by a company that I approached since I really had the perfect background for them. Two interviews, the first one went really smooth, we had a good time and they saw I was, indeed, a solid candidate for what they were looking for.
Before the second one they wanted me to sign an NDA. I thought that was ridiculous and refused politely. We hadn't even discussed salary, lol.
After that they just sent me their generic "sorry but you're not a good fit for us, wish you the best" email.
Since I didn't sign anything, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯, during the interview their CTO was telling me that their churn rate was abysmal and that had investors truly worried; also a couple engineers before me had quit (quit, not fired), one during its first week at the job. So, in the end, it wasn't a good gig anyway.
Anyway, asking for an NDA (in almost any context) is kind of like a rookie thing to do. I think you dodged a bullet as you stated in your update.
The only exception was a company that asked me to sign a NDA just for an informal chat. Normally I don't mind a simple NDA, but this company NDA was VERY draconic, it was pretty much full non compete rather than the typical "dont leak your interview questions, dont spy on us". Obviously I refused to sign the NDA and stopped my conversations with this company.
Wow, your intuition was correct, what a mess. Surprised to see this from a highly valued YC portfolio company. They asked me to prepare for a presentation as part of an interview and cancelled that just now (a few days before the scheduled interview).
On top of this poorly constructed NDA issue…really feel like I dodged a bullet.
Instead of refusing to sign it, I asked for 20k compensation instead. They refused so that was that.
If they can't interview you without an NDA, they're not worth working for
The CIA doesn't require an NDA to interview - there's no reason some random YC startup should
NDA for a private job? They need to pay for a lawyer to review it for you, so you don't end up in a silly non-compete situation.
If that’s deemed unreasonable, it might be a tell regarding how the company views employees since they expect something for nothing.
Good luck.
Here are some rules for what to expect, based on every interview NDA I've ever signed: It shouldn't cover anything but non-public info you get during the interview, and it should be stated so simply that you don't need legal review.[0] You should only be asked to sign one before you go into an interview in which you're going to get non-public info - so, probably not before tech screens or behavioral screens. Don't expect to learn the 12 secret ingredients just because you've signed an NDA; it's more to protect any info to which you may be accidentally exposed. And... nope, I can't think of anything else actually. It's that simple.
[0] Admittedly I'd be wary of signing even a simple NDA in an unfamiliar jurisdiction, but that may just be an issue you'd have to absorb when doing cross-jurisdictional job seeking. You might in theory seek out legal advice on what a simple interview NDA should look like and any pitfalls to watch out for that differ from your own familiar jurisdiction. Definitely don't sign anything in a language in which you aren't completely fluent.
Non-negotiable - the NDA must be both tightly time-limited and narrow in scope.
Much-desired - they tell you enough (in writing) about the compensation, responsibilities, hours, etc. - before you sign - that there's little chance of "why did I sign an NDA for a 'meh' job?" regret.
Ideally - the burden of proof (if they come after you, claiming that you blabbed) should be on them.
If they want to bind you to a contract then they should pay for it.
Unless you actively use the interview to steal trade secrets and then take them to a competitor, there is basically nothing they can do.