Second comment: based on the poster's recent submission history, the flagged / dead posts would have ended up that way under any circumstances, would probably have the account banned for pursuing some weird agenda on a tech discussion site if it was brought to moderator attention, and in no way have anything to do with "botnets"
Happy to discuss (in good faith)
> This has been censored by the moderators a few times
I'm not sure this is accurate, I'm pretty sure moderated comments just show as [dead], whereas things flagged by the community show [flagged] in addition to [dead].
As for why you're being flagged, from an outsider perspective your recent posts are accusations of an unknown person with no further discussion being possible due to a lack of info.
I'm not sure there's a conspiracy theory following you around, your posts need more of a to and fro than just a to. Try optimising for discussion rather than soapbox
E: Happened to see your latest flag in real-time.. try being less pissed off about stuff too when you post.
It's a site for discussing interesting things, not really for rants about whatever just got you wound up. I understand you're charged and ready to go but from an outside angle that's kinda boring if I don't already agree with you, and if I do agree with you then again there's no discussion to be had
--
Not really too relevant other than I think you might like the read, there's an article here that looks into Hacker News moderation which includes some clarification from HN mods on how stuff works https://drewdevault.com/2017/09/13/Analyzing-HN.html
Also, why do people try to sneak Epoch Times articles in via archive sites? They're garbage.