Please let me know if you think brands would see any value in this.
https://www.eurogamer.net/sega-stalls-nft-plans-following-ne...
But otherwise I don't see this offering anything that an NFC tag linked to a regular database maintained by the brand doesn't. "Authentically made by this entity" doesn't sound like a use case for trustlessness...
Let’s say it’s for a designer bag. If that bag wears down, and I move the tag to a bag that looks the same but wasn’t sold by the manufacturer, how do the tag or the NFT help discover that the bag isn’t authentic?
But NFTs are more collectibles, so arguably you could sell the bag WITH an NFT as a bonus (not as proof of authenticity) and I think people into NFTs would like it.
Or make sure the NFT metadata has something to associate it to the physical product so you can prove that it hasn't been tampered with.
Are you planning to use a public, permissionless ledger like Ethereum, or a private, permissioned ledger like Hyperledger Fabric? (The first is bad, the latter maybe ok)
While the consumer may find value in this, will the company prefer to put this transparency off as long as possible because of their dirty laundry they are hiding?
This sounds like a horrible idea, to be honest.