Does HN do anything to prevent AI-grade bots?
Hi, since conversation between human users at HN is what makes the platform attractive at it is, I am wondering what HN is doing, or is going to do, when more sophisticated bots could land to parrot certain narratives or influence the conversation on important topics. Is there any way to detect such behavior?
One of my favorite aspects of HN is that we judge people by what they say, not who says it. The minimalist profiles, without any profile pics, are a feature.
If a bot dispenses wisdom, then why not? It's still the responsibility of readers to check for truth and flag astroturfing and other violation of the guidelines.
I don't know that it would matter. Propaganda, astroturfing and shilling campaigns are old news, and were old long before computer networks. I don't think there's a practical way of preventing such things.
For detection, fingerprinting would probably work for individual training sets or implementations, but with an advanced adversary (especially if they're politically rather than profit motivated), I'm not confident you could even whack-a-mole well.
If such a hypothetical bot really can pass as human what would you suggest the defense be? People are quite capable of pushing agendas themselves.
It has always been possible to outsource this work for a few cents. Whether it's a bot or cheap labor from an English-speaking third world country doesn't make that much of a difference.
I don't think HN is mainstream enough for people to push agendas. But on platforms like YouTube, etc this has been the norm for years.
GPT sucks at being like a human, it rapidly loses context
Trivial steps to reduce most of the spam / future spam:
1. Make the HN accounts scarce
2. And / or make them cost some bitcoin