It was with a mid-tier cryptocurrency exchange. I knew their culture was terrible since the NYT recently covered them, so I can’t say I was surprised.
It appears the balance of power has shifted back to employers.
We're in TN and I need to go have face to face meetings with people in New Mexico and Utah. And can't let my boss know: which I failed at.
Drove out and discovered that my boss had heard that I was looking for other employment, he called ahead to the folks I had lined up interviews with (and several others) and spun them a story that had them refuse to meet me and had the police come check out whatever it was they'd heard 3rd or 4th hand.
5,000 mile road trip, there and back again. In 5 days. Didn't find out the whole story for a couple years. At least I got to drive past the VLA radio telescope.
Exactly what you’d expect from a company specializing in pixie dust.
> It appears the balance of power has shifted back to employers.
I respectfully disagree. Try getting a job at a more traditional organization, like a good old bank, if you’re interested in finance.
I had told them I was weighing their offer against a different one. In fact I slightly preferred their situation.
After several rounds of this ridiculous dance, I finally realized I didn't want to work for a company that acted with so little decency.
I've no doubt that wasn't the case everywhere at Uber, but it was a bad experience.
One time I was offered a high-level architect position at a technical consulting firm, and they proceeded to make me a job offer. I gave verbal acceptance, then the next day they came back and said they still wanted me but with a lower title and compensation.
I was still young and naive, and was quite surprised and then really didn't respond well (super offended). That was the end of that.
Dodged a bullet, getting pimped out by a consulting firm and working on projects without any ownership isn't my cup of tea anyway. Some people are truly Thoughtless.
"About your offer, here at XXX we have the practice of doing an induction test before signing any contracts with any new hires."
This was the first time I had heard about this. It would have been fine if they did the induction test before they made the offer, but I had never heard of it being done after an offer. I told them:
"I was very surprised to get this message. I thought I had already gone through all the technical screening steps during the interview process. To be told that I have to go through another screening step, even after you verbally made me an offer and had me fill in all the paperwork, is simply not professional.
I'm inclined to say let's call the whole thing off. It isn't clear that you really want me to work for you. Can you convince me that this isn't true?"
Needless to say, I didn't go work for them.
She apparently met all the requirements, completely convincing them to hire her as she had bucketloads of experience in the private and public sector. They actually told her that she had the job, so she immediately started to arrange things for a move.
Two weeks later, her boss in Investments NSW, Amy Brown, told her that the position had been rescinded as it was a "cabinet process" - which it never turned out to be - and it was given to the former politician who created the original roles in the first place!
Eventually, it came out that Amy Brown told her it was a "gift" for someone else.
On top of this she was not able to return to her job as deputy secretary of Investment NSW - West had been made redundant!
Right now there are serious claims of corruption. It blew up in the politician's faces and John Barilaro who got the job over West was forced to resign from the position.
In terms of money offers, I had one place that I interviewed for, and I nailed it. Like, really nailed it, walked out of the startup and they literally said they will work on an offer right away. They offered me $10k less a year than I was asking. After a weekend of not responding, they upped the offer to what I asked for. I didn't go there, and I don't regret it in the slightest. I don't want to be the cost you pinch. (And no, I wasn't even asking for a raise to go there)
Maybe the balance of power is shifting back to employers, but it's still premature to act on that assumption. Plenty of room to negotiate and get good jobs.
You dodged a bullet. Whatever company this is appears to be circling the drain. The problem you'll face now is: how many other companies are in the same position?
Interviewed at a startup, it was small but had just landed a VERY large customer in addition to series B so they were going nuts with the hiring. I daresay I did well during the interview and within a week we'd moved onto discussing salary etc.
Now for the non-Australian readers here superannuation is your mandatory retirement savings/investment fund. Your employer has to pay you a minimum % of your salary on top of your actual salary to your super fund and you can't touch it until a certain age. In 99.99% of cases employment contracts here will state your salary PLUS super so they'll say something like "$100,000 plus superannuation of x% paid fortnightly/monthly/whatever".
Back to the offer;
We agreed upon a figure, lets say it was $100k + options + superannuation (I have no memory, this was many years ago) - notice all the plusses here everything we talked about was IN ADDITION TO the base salary. A few days pass and I've heard nothing so I flick an email to the hiring manager, and still hear nothing back. A few more days pass and out of the blue I get a Docusign request containing my contract, yay!
Being young at the time I was just going to sign it immediately but I had a feeling in the back of my mind that I should double check, and sure enough they were trying to screw me over. The remuneration section read "$100,000 inclusive of superannuation and stock options value at $SomeAmount". They were trying to short change me somewhere in the ballpark of $30k by their own estimates. I called the hiring manager and of course he tried to pretend this was what we had discussed all along (it wasn't, because no one in Australia does that) so I told them to go jump.
Turns out I dodged a bullet - their one large customer sued them (quite publicly at the time), and Accenture or someone similar swooped in after that fact and bought the survivors for pennies on the dollar, and then fired everyone.
I don't know what they were thinking. Their offer wasn't so good to make such demands. I don't know why they demand 3 months notice, yet were unwilling to wait for me to be fully checked before I signed and gave notice.
Also, their checks requires facial recognition to a third party. They claimed my data would be safe, but it's an incredibly shitty thing to do to an employee.
Instead they massively low-balled me with a lower base than what I was making at the time plus ~30% of the RSUs that they'd need to hit my number. I asked the recruiter and the company both about this and they said that the value of the RSUs was predicated on "their growth potential" and that I had to account for their future value. I double-checked with the recruiter to make sure that there wasn't a miscommunication and they confirmed that the company knew what my requirement was.
Needless to say this made my decision fairly simple. Their share price was in the toilet and I'd never worked for a company that granted RSUs before so maybe they thought that they'd be able to pull a fast one on me, but it was a colossal waste of everybody's time regardless.
First impressions may not be everything, but I wish I'd gone with my gut on that one.
If they can't get their act together for interviewing and hiring, they're going to have a much harder time attracting talented engineers and probably have serious management problems internally. You dodged a bullet.
> It appears the balance of power has shifted back to employers
As a counterpoint, I haven't experienced any decreased demand and am still having an easy time interviewing for what I want. I think some of the discourse around this is employers wanting to scare devs into taking lower comp, similar to how a number of very profitable companies immediately and significantly raised prices in response to inflation discourse.
I saw that same job advertised for a couple of years at roughly 3-6 month intervals.
You did them a favor by doing so. They didn't do you any favors? I would have ghosted such a company.
The worst experience I had was to have an offer get retracted before I could make my decision. I'm not so bitter about it to name them but I'll never work for that company, that's for sure.
They declined it at the last minute citing internal replacement.
Name & Shame: Storm two dot com recruitment
I recently interviewed with a startup. The tech and mission aligned great with my interests. I interviewed with them and it was a beautiful fit. I was super happy. The recruiter (call him R) worked for a recruitment company (not part of the startup I was applying for) and seemed like a good guy.
Then the offer came in. R got on a call with me to discuss and dialed in his manager/VP? (call him S for Seb because that's his name).
Shit turned ugly so fast. While the offer was good for a startup it was still less (-25%) TC than I currently make. I was still completing interviews and this offer was the first on the table. So I wanted some more time to decide. The offer itself even had a clause that it was valid for 10 days.
S got abrasive and downright hostile and aggressive. He acted like he'd never heard of someone taking time to consider an offer. He then pulled out *every* shady used-car-salesman manipulation trick in the book. It's like he was going for a blackout BINGO card:
- changing negotiators: the fact that he joined the call at all was a tactic
- negged me: acted like I wasn't "that senior" and the company was taking a risk on me
- illusory time-crunch: they need to fill this role "NOW" and can't wait another week
- anger projection-deflection: he acted like I was the one being aggressive as soon as he started being aggressive
- "spirit of the offer" vs "letter of the offer": acted like taking the offer verbiage literally (the 10-day expiry period on the offer) was somehow wrong. This is the part I absolutely hate the most about these offer negotiations. They want you to accept them "on faith" but that's LITERALLY not how written contracts work. Top-tier scumbag negotiation tactics.
- Acting like I was the one to suddenly start lying or changing my mind: I'd been very clear from the beginning that I was going to take time to consider offers.
My wife was next to me while I was on that call and it took us all evening to "come down" from how heated it was. We'd dealt with car salesmen and had bought a house together. We were no strangers to intense negotiations but this was nothing like anything we'd ever dealt with.
R texted me later with a semi-apology on behalf of S, but S never did the same.
On the next call with R, it was glaringly obvious that S was on the call but muted. R's responses were delayed by several seconds and you could tell he was getting advice on another line.
Thereafter R texted or called me nearly every day for the next week. Now he started adopting S's tactics:
- Reminded me that other companies might go with other candidates (yeah, no shit, that's how this all works)
- Claiming that taking the offer would help *my* "mental health and financial stability" WTF? The offer was literally less money than I currently make. It practically came through as a threat.
Again, R & Seb belonged to a recruitment company that I would probably never interact with again if I took the offer, but holy shit had they completely soured the deal.
I'm still deliberating on whether I should let the startup know what happened because I don't think they ever got my side of the story. Seb probably just told them I ghosted him and was "playing games" or something.
I didn’t respond and moved on.