That said, even always upgrading to The Latest Thing can be done responsibly as long as you're making sure those old devices go to people who can get use out of them. Questionably useful gizmos are less great – I wanted a smart watch, got one, and regret it.
Hedonic treadmill is real, so keeping emotional distance from these things is useful.
What are you optimizing for?
If you are optimizing for the most experience with emerging tech, then no it's not wrong, you need to get access to it.
If you are optimizing for reducing e-waste, then you should be probably getting older tech and reusing it or selling tech that you've repaired.
If you are optimizing for minimal possessions, then yes, it could be bad if that means more objects.
If you are trading in and trading up and optimizing for "tech that holds value" then no, it's not wrong.
Often when people pass value judgements it's because they are optimizing for a different thing, and low and behold, that's where disagreements stem from.
If yes to the first two and no to the latter two, tell your peers to suck it. If any other combination maybe you have some introspection to do, figure out what value (if any) you're actually getting out of the purchase.
Will you enjoy the gadget just as much a year from now, or is it like buying a luxury car where after a while it just becomes "a car"? The hedonic treadmill is real when it comes to things
So obviously I'd say there's nothing wrong with splurging at all. The question is what you do with it once you replace it when you splurge again; I'm certainly guilty of having an ever-growing collection of "spare parts", but even that's better than the landfill.
I only worry about getting privacy invading gadgets like home assistants and things that measure biological activity amd phone home.
I saw other posts after commenting and everyone is worried about waste. This idea of making consumers accountable is ridiculous. You are not responsible for ewaste as much as you are not responsible for global warming. It is the responsibility of manufacturers to maintain a sustainable carbon foot print and properly plan for disposal of ewaste, it is the responsibility of government to regulate all of this as well and impose taxes and cost as needed. The price of what you buy should reflect all of this. If everyone can buy 100 iphones that means the cost of managing ewaste and producing it responsibly was priced in. If it was not them the corner-cutters are responsible not the consumer.
There is absolutley no way you can get enough people to care about ewaste or carbon footprint to make an iota of a difference anytime this century.
My rule-of-thumb is that if it helps me be more productive or creative, it's a worthy investment. A Remarkable tablet has been my best tech purchase so far.
> What does the community think?
What do you think?
That being said, there's a point where it tends to become diminishing returns. You don't need a super computer to code CRUD sites, especially nowadays (I say as I'm browsing the internet from my sorta fancy gaming desktop, but I do play games on it as well).
Let me ask you this: why did you spend the money? Is it stuff that will genuinely make your life and the lives of those around you better? Or is it stuff that you are buying to fill a void in your life caused by a lack of relationships or longing that something has yet to fill.
If it's the former, then maybe you ought to consider what actually does or doesn't make your life better. If it's the latter, then perhaps you ought to seek out those things rather than trying to buy yourself into "happiness".
I generally keep an iPhone for three to four years, that said I don't buy a ton of fancy add ons or chargers. I did upgrade to a top of the line iPhone 13 Pro before a work trip to London (getting lost or without money because I wanted to keep an old phone with a less than okay battery seemed stupid).
I have the same mophie wireless charger I bought on prime day five years ago. It works fine, charging your phone slower is actually better for battery life otherwise I just use macbook USB c chargers for everything else.
My only other personal standard is "life is too short to deal with slow computers". It's literally my time, and dealing with something that breaks all the time is just not worth the frustration. So in other words I just don't use windows anything.
This goes without saying, I'm otherwise a very frugal person. Not sure if it's risk aversion - more so seems like keeping options open. I had a brief period of buying everything I wanted, and that just made me feel empty and moronic. Having $$ decently invested means options. Also goes without saying, my salary is pathetic compared to most engineers here.
If I were to spend $2500 on a guitar I know that 20, 40, 60 or even 100 years from now that guitar will play just as well, if not better, than it does today. OTOH if I were to spend $2500 on a laptop I know that 10 years from now, if not sooner, it will be a piece of junk.
Basically this is how I justify buying guitars to my wife! :)
Some things have lasting value. Art, crystal, good furniture, those are better items on which to spend money. Technology? It goes obsolete so fast you're essentially renting the item. Which is why, BTW, I've never bought an Apple Watch. It doesn't do anything my phone can't do and I've never spent more than $40 on a Timex. If I were to start slinging around serious money into a watch it would be a Rolex or something of that ilk. I guarantee it'll work just as well 100 years from now as it does today - decades after the Apple Watch was useless.
I prefer spending my money on things that last and tech just doesn't last. If you don't mind perpetually renting items and it tickles your fancy and fits your budget, then by all means, indulge.
Otherwise tell them to pound sand.
Joking (half) aside, as others (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32070678) said, it’s your hard-earned money. People will criticize you for doing what you want much more intensely than they will thank you for not doing it.
Now, if you find that many of the things you buy don’t spark joy but rather make you feel dissatisfied and start looking for the next thing to buy, then there might be a problem.
So let me ask you. If those peers did not make you feel bad, would you feel bad on your own that you shouldn't have splurged ? If answer is No, then move on. Nothing to see here.
People always have opinions. Sometimes they are good, sometimes they are whatever. You do what works best for you. Listen to your peers but ultimately it is your life. If you want to splurge and are willing to accept consequences (good or bad), your call. It is called Freedom.
If you asked those same people if getting abortions is immoral, they would likely say no, and that no one should be moralizing a woman's right to choose what to do with their body. And they are 100% right.
And in the same vein, they should not be moralizing what you decide to do with your money.
This creates a niche where you can stagnate or remain stunted emotionally and socially, yet compensate with gadgets.
Personally: I used to be more into new shiny things than I am. I still enjoy getting new stuff, who doesn’t, but I try to temper that with enjoying getting longevity out of the stuff I already have. I think it is right to deeply consider the ecological and exploitative impact of what we buy, but unless you completely change your lifestyle to actually not need much tech at all, self-loathing austerity is miserable too. Have good justifications for the things you buy, and once you do, enjoy them. Take good care of them and find a good home for them once you don’t want them any more.