Even if these posts are 100% legal (ie there's no upvoting ring behind them) I still feel that the moderators should manually demote them from the front page because right now it feels like some form of cheap advertising trick.
Why not add a rule? Only one front page post about a product every month.
I'd really like to get some insights from the community and the moderation about that.
Thank you!
Blame the game, not the player.
I know I will click on a Tailscale post because people have said it's cool, I tried, and it is indeed cool and it feels like I'm only scratching the surface.
There is astroturfing on HN but don't forget we're a bunch of enthusiastic tech nerds. Do you complain because there is a big number of Linux or M1 posts? People really like them.
Disclaimer: not affiliated with Tailscale or any of its employees, haven't interviewed with them, not even giving them any money. I am not from a marketing or ad agency but just a lowly SWEng nerd.
As for your rule limiting submissions to the front page to only one every month. Who’s gonna moderate that? Are blog posts about the product also prohibited? Cause that is how I learned about Tailscale in the first place.
My point being, no I wouldn’t want a rule to moderate something like this. Because I come to hackernews to learn about these types of stuff.
Learn to ignore stuff in live you don’t enjoy.
Banning Rust for example, would be a massive improvement for the overall quality of the site but would deter a lot of conversations and site traffic. HN is an important part of making sure that YC companies have built-in exposure and marketing by using the site to ensure that a lot of people will see certain posts. In this same way, Tailscale is important to saturate the audience with, recently.
I don’t envy the job, however poorly I think it might be being done. It’s like being a world leader or something. It’d be miserably stressful for most people who complain about it, but absolutely catastrophic if they tried themselves. Someone has to do it, at the end of the day.
So no surprise that the product he made is also interesting to HN
My personal opinion is that missing either one of those posts through a "once a month" rule would be a negative to me. I personally read both and interacted with both and got value from them.
Deno and fly.io are also things that seem to have been mentioned a lot lately and while I'm not in the "market" for them like I am for Tailscale, I still find it useful to see those mentions.
Much of what I get from HN, like going to Python conferences, is just hearing the "word on the street". Artificially muting that word on the street because something similar has been mentioned within the last month, is a disservice.
Finally, your point about "Say I have a tailscale alternative, how do I overcome the Tailscale inertia?"... You do cool stuff. Tailscale SSH is something they recently built and is very cool. However, the first mention can ride on the coattails, much like one of those tailscale references I mentioned above: "netbird is a tailscale alterantive". But it just didn't generate enough interest.
If you can show legitimate vote fraud or the like that is leading to Tailscale showing up unreasonably frequently (again, it seems your perception is skewed, because TS has only been frontpage twice this month), then that's one thing. But muting what other people seem to be legitimately finding interesting is totally unreasonable.
Other than that, keep in mind that major updates of software/services often result in a flood of secondary "literature" about the topic.
• Once you have tried Tailscale - you are hooked;
• The team behind Tailscale is capable of changing the industry;
• Tailscale users become evangelists;
Sincerely yours, Tailscale fan