HACKER Q&A
📣 throwawayzzbb1

Thoughts on Terminating Underperformer


I have an under-performer in my team. Performance has been below par for a while and it is my failure for not addressing it sooner (as the manager). Employee had health issues and other life events that made the company's leadership give person a chance to improve. It is clear the person is not going to perform at the required level. Any guidance or frameworks to rationalize termination? I have not done this before and really not looking forward to it. HR is not being too helpful.


  👤 jarl-ragnar Accepted Answer ✓
Start by reviewing your company process for performance management. Then follow it. At each step notify HR of your intentions. Document all meetings you have with the individual concerned and HR.

Set clear achievable short term goals with the individual that enable you to clearly identify and articulate their poor performance. Use that to reiterate performance expectations. If performance doesn’t improve, begin escalating with HR support (by that I mean tell them what you intend to do next and get them to sit in on formal meetings).

Having been through this myself it’s about ensuring it isn’t a surprise to the individual concerned that their performance is poor and creating the evidence that you followed a reasonable process leading up to any termination because worst case you and the Company end up being taken to employment tribunal. And that’s where your thorough notes and evidence that HR were advised on the steps you were planning to take are key.

And as a manager you have to pursue this because the wider team will know who’s not performing and be watching to see how the business addresses it. If you’re lucky the individual will decide to leave once they realise the direction of travel.

Good luck. And I recommend the book “Radical Candor”


👤 dekhn
Generally, the rule test for this is "can the person do the job they were hired to do", and if they can't, it's fine to fire them, so long as you have properly documented their inability, and given them sufficient time to rectify it (typically 6 months to 1 year). I understand this is unpleasant (and almost feels "wrong") to do, but, ethically, I think that a good manager has an imperative to do this.