Invest near the depths of the recession for the winners of the recovery where everything looks like its on a firesale.
The problem is of course timing the bottom. And resisting the emotional urge to think nothing could ever recover.
The 2020 extraordinarily V-shaped recovery surprised me a lot.
Given that nothing financial is really popping that hard and a lot of the headwinds we're facing now are just high commodities prices, bullwhip effects from the pandemic, and China is shutting down again, all of those factors are likely to be temporary so any near-term recession is likely to be V-shaped as well.
I suspect this is just a correction and we're close to maximum pessimism and investors should start looking for what to buy in the near term. And if you didn't already sell then you're probably too late and would be looking at locking in any losses that you had and missing the rebound.
But this is a description of conditions as they are today, not a crystal ball of the future. If something detonates tomorrow everything could change (and literally if Russia launches some nukes at Kiev tomorrow everything may change in an instant -- but I'm more considering a financial detonation).
Housing has continued shooting up, as those in the 30s find themselves with fewer assets to buy it with. The low interest rates amortize the costs allowing affordability, but the older generation still gets a massive payout. Then when the economy start recovering back up, the older generations find themselves with all of this liquidity to exploit, while the younger generation is stuck paying off mortgages.
Housing is controlled politically, and holds safety, convenience and schooling hostage. It doesn't play the supply-n-demand game. Thus, it gets to stay unaffected by recession as long as default rate stay low. I am not sure what the mechanism for it is, but I do selfishly wish that housing prices and interest rates will back down to normal sometime soon.
I think that streaming services will not do well. People will return to torrenting and piracy. Same with crypto trading platforms. Basically any place where Joe Average can't afford to spend more than he has on hand. Tesla will see a big drop too, as people will cash out to buy their groceries.
As for what will: free for the end user services that get by on ad revenue and data mining. Alphabet, Facebook, stuff like that.
They're bullish on a subset of tech that's specifically focussed on efficiency and process automation.
I think the same category would do well in a recession. If money is tight, you'll trim down your workforce and you'll cut out "nice to have" goods and services from your budget, but you probably won't cut services/tools that help you get things done faster with fewer people.
Companies offering free services or cheap ownership of things should do well I think, but any company that relies on subscriptions or upgrades would be hit hard.
Anything energy related.
Geography also plays an important role. Places like the valley saw very little impact while the place I was living at in the South basically had it's software ecosystem gutted. It did bounce back within a year though, so just make sure you have enough funds to ride a recession out in the worst case.
They drop Five Guys and go back to McDonald's. Panera vs Subway, Chipotle vs Taco Bell, etc.
In this case _my_ assessment is that we're facing a prolonged period of high inflation partially fueled by factors which can't be mitigated by Fed actions (COVID lockdowns in China, global transportation backlogs, European conflict, food shortages) and perpetuated by high household savings levels. I don't think we're going to face significant slowdown of consumer spending this year.
In that economic environment, consumer staples which do their own production and have the ability to quickly respond to inflation are favoured. I'm in a sector ETF for this.
I also believe profitable tech which is ad-funded is at an advantage - anything where prices are set by auction and ROI is demonstrable/visible is golden, as are industries like cloud computing which have natural deflationary economics. This implies Meta/Goog/MSFT (and in this I'm betting on specific tactics and am choosing specific companies).
Those are my bets, you should form your own hypothesis and extrapolate appropriately.
Also note that these are systemic factors, but will always be dominated by idiosyncratic realities. Individual stocks are only loosely correlated with sector movement, if you think you have a winner or asymmetric knowledge about a specific company don't let larger trends dissuade you (or vice versa).
Finally, a corollary to the above: when you invest on macro/sector trends, do so through sector/strategy ETFs. If you're investing on asymmetric knowledge or insight, invest in specific equities. Combine the two strategies at your peril.
First, do you directly make money for a company, or directly reduce costs? The closer you are to core activities that generate income, or increase efficiency, then the more protected you will be from being laid off. This applies to companies too in a way.
Companies need core services like email or ERP. Chat like Slack is now core compared to the situation in 2008. This core software is going to be the last thing that companies want to change. What they will focus on eliminating is all of the nice-to-have software that has been deployed in their organization. SaaS costs add up at the department and company levels and companies will look to eliminate low hanging fruit.
If something has low usage numbers, that'll go. When some product has a nice UX, but there is an alternative within some other product, then the nice UX won't win out (e.g. use Jira instead of Asana.)
These are examples of software, but the same patterns play out across other categories. What's worth considering, is how can these things come out of a recession? At the start of the recession, contingent staff or contractors were often let go before employees. As the economy recovered, hiring contractors was a safer bet during the uncertain window when it wasn't clear that we had turned a corner. SaaS started to become a viable option because you could get started cheaply and didn't have to stump up funds for implementation. We take SaaS for granted now, but a lot of the growth came out of the last recession when you could make arguments for it.
Success or Grow meaningfully: not sure. There's also other risks (geopolitical, supply chain). It also depends on what it means by growth. Growing revenue? Is success measured by external measures (stock price) or other intrinsic factors (profitability)
Credit/pay-later services will have greater credit losses, higher risks and higher rates.
Viewing hours on ad-based tech might not be negatively affected, but that doesn't translate linearly to revenue.
Yes, even Microsoft had some layoffs back in 2008-2009, and Google had some 'stealth' closures. Also they did a hire freeze as well back then. Just right now they laid off the GCP customer support team. We know all the others (Uber, Airbnb, Lyft, etc, had all layoffs as well).
It really depends on the CEO's mentality. Some companies, even if their balance sheet is fine, they will use as an excuse to cut some fat.
So far only Apple and Meta are the exceptions.
Big companies that make money, google, apple, etc will be fine. For medium sized companies if you involved in a unit that makes the company money or run core infrastructure you should also be fine. For smallish companies if they survive you better hope you are single point of failure and if you left things would be in a bad state.
I guess what I’m asking is are you looking for stocks to invest in or a job to ride out the storm kinda thing?
As for investing, you're probably best off with the bog-standard 'invest in everything' index fund - during a recession is when you get to pick up shares at lower prices, but it's hard to time the bottom.
Even "big names" like Berkshire can be affected by a recession.
Food, drugs and administration.
Add to that deep science and technology ventures that would do well anyway and don't care if it's a recession.
It's an industry built on top of a cat and mouse game and so will always be required in some capacity, and things like breaches and fines are recession invariant.
Skimp on security at your own risk.
every company that’s not driven by hype (example: crypto, chatbots) and not focused on growth as primary objective
Maybe some are closer to government spending which maybe will rise in a recession but they will all be hurt.