In other words, I could defeat the best strategists in history (Napoleon, Caesar, Alexander) and their armies if I have a big technological advantage (e.g. atom bomb).
There are thousands of strategy books out there, but I haven't found a single book that talks about how important (and decisive) a technological advantage is.
The closest I've seen is Neil deGrasse Tyson's "Accessory to War" (which I loved!), but it was primarily about the relationship between the astrophysics community and the military community.
Is there a book that talks exclusively about technology being the decisive factor in victories throughout history? (and ideally gives several examples) This can go all the way back to bronze weapons losing to iron weapons, to more recently WWII being won by the first country who developed nuclear weapons.
Japan could have (and would have) been beaten without the atomic bomb at a high cost in American and Japanese lives.
The atomic bomb changed the arc of history because it intimidated the Soviets. Even after VJ-day planners thought it very possible that the US would go to war with the Soviet Union -- since the Korean war involved mainland China it also could have become an unlimited conflict.
See also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_(short_story)
and the ironic use of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wunderwaffe
To be positive here is a very good example of technology winning the war
https://www.amazon.com/Britains-Shield-Radar-Defeat-Luftwaff...
Probably not. There are loads of examples of less technologically advanced groups defeating more advanced opponents (or at least forcing them to give up). A few examples:
- Vietnam against the French, then the Americans
- Afghanistan against the British, the Soviets, and the Americans
- Haiti against the French
- America vs. the British
- Germanic Barbarians vs. the Roman Empire
- IRA vs. the British
Some writers (Gladwell comes to mind) have even suggested that the opposite is true, namely that the number of times a more technologically advanced power has been defeated or at least held off by a less powerful, less technologically advanced opponent is actually much higher than one would expect looking simply at the capabilities of each party involved.
Much more play geography and psychology, also extremely important economics, but to be strict, all these three things are strongly tied.
For this I know two excellent books: 1. Revenge of geography. Kaplan. 2. The strategy of indirect approach. Basil Liddell Hart. (He argues for indirect moves, but for me, all his examples about effective using geography and psychology).
And sure, best book on war for all times - the Art of war Sun Tzu, but should read from few translations simultaneously, because some missing important things and others are written too knotted.
https://www.amazon.com/Most-Secret-Penguin-World-Collection/...
The Splendid and The Vile goes on a 1-2 chapter tangent about the very interesting use of radar during WW2 for targeting London and the many counter measures developed by the British. It seems that there must be great books out there about this.
Similarly the book Cadillac Desert has a chapter about how the large Damns built in the Pacific Northwest had a massive surplus of electricity, which enabled the smelting(?) of aluminum in quantities so large that it allowed the allies to outproduce the Germans and win the air war because of it. Planes were being shot down at a similar rate.
(Sadly not a book)