Essentially the CIPS as already mentioned would be most likely alternative, which is partially why people are afraid to exercise this option as it could lead to weakening of USD and SWIFT in general. Crypto is considered by the author an option but honestly I fail to see how it could work at scale, since you could refuse to interact with known accounts (https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/02/24/us-to-expand-sanc...)
Both Bitcoin and Ethereum can perform the settlement of transactions. Ethereum currently has support for complex financial transactions with Smart Contracts. A SWIFT replacement could include settlement on chain, but on-chain transactions for SWIFT type co-ordination is probably too expensive with Bitcoin and Ethereum without the use of L2 and Lightning Network support for the co-ordination feature of SWIFT.
If this were done, it would only succeed if the smart contracts are open source, formally verified and audited by a third party. While Taproot adds tapscript support[2] to bitcoin, there still remains the development of sophisticated financial products.
As a net exporter of Energy products, Russia would probably lean more towards Bitcoin or other PoW protocols, as their customers could run mining operations with the energy they are buying. This would exclude Ethereum when the PoS merge occurs.
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SWIFT [2]: https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/tapscript/